農村規劃指標對農村再生先期規劃之驗證

Abstract

本研究目的在藉由台灣農村問題探究，找出符合規劃理論及台灣農村所需的農村規劃指標，並藉此比較近期有關台灣農村發展的農村改建條例草案、農村再生條例草案及農村再生條例等三法案，找出最符合農村規劃指標者，並提出法案修正之建議。 研究方法先從文獻中了解農村發展的問題及農村規劃的內涵、面向，進而再佐以SWOT分析法歸納出農村規劃指標，再透過問卷、AHP層級分析，另以農村社區抽樣分析、成對樣本t檢定、討論回饋等方式，探討當前農村再生條例在農村規劃指標上之實證，進一步探討農村再生條例修法方向。 本研究建立農村規劃指標架構，共包含三個層面、六個分類，涵括19項農村規劃指標。針對農村發展三法案依「農村規劃指標」以專家問卷之方案評估結果，以「農村再生條例」為最符合農村規劃指標之方案。個別農村社區規劃之「民眾版」與「專業版」，以成對樣本t檢定有顯著性的差異。 本研究就農村發展三法案之實證討論、個別農村再生計畫之實證討論及農村再生條例推動之問題作分析及歸納後，針對12項農村規劃指標提出對應之農村再生條例條文增修建議。

This study aims at the exploration of Taiwan rural issues so as to find out the practical planning theories and the rural planning indicator required for the Taiwan rural districts, and on this basis, to further make comparison of the three bills recently established for and related to the rural development, i.e., The Draft of the Rural Reconstruction Regulation, The Draft of The Rural Regeneration Regulation, and The Rural Regeneration Act. It would be of the highest purpose of this article to single out the best in line with the rural planning indicator and, accordingly, to propose a bill amendment. The study method of this article starts from the literature for understanding the problems of rural development and rural planning, including its content and its various aspects of orientation. And then, combining with SWOT analysis in summarizing a rural planning indicator, practicing through a questionnaire and Analytic Hierarchy Process Theory (AHP), and applying the rural community sample analysis, paired t-test examination, as well as the feedback discussion etc., it certainly would be sufficient to serve as the complete processes of verification in the current rural planning indicator under the Rural Regeneration Act. The indicator framework of the rural planning structured in this study consists of three (3) levels of dimension, six (6) categories of classification, and nineteen (19) items of rural planning indicator. Viewing the above-mentioned three bills of rural development, it is evidently understandable that the Rural Regeneration Act would be of the best program benefiting the rural planning indicator when evaluating it with the questionnaire practicing under the rural planning indicator. In examine of the individual rural society planning, covering “Popular Edition” and “Professional Edition”, there were significant differences after taking the paired t-test examination. This study has been attentively focusing on the discussions of the three bills of rural development and for the individual rural regeneration planning. Efforts have also been put on the issue of promoting the Rural Regeneration Act. After generalizing the analysis and inductive method, this article hereby aims at the twelve (12) items of rural planning indicators to present the counter proposal on the amendments of the Rural Regeneration Act.