Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11455/5183
標題: 旋轉生物盤法處理不同性質有機廢水其適宜組合程序之研究
The Study on Optimal Operation of the Aerobic-Anaerobic-Two Phase Rotating Biological Contactor Combined Processes for the Treatment of Different Kinds of Organic Wastewaters
作者: 謝潮明
Shieh, Chaur-Ming
關鍵字: 組合程序;旋轉生物盤法;有機體積負荷
出版社: 環境工程學系
摘要: 
摘 要 本研究之目的,乃利用旋轉生物
盤法四種組合程序,針對模擬家庭污水及工業廢水之合成有機廢水,進行
組合程序之適宜性探討,研究內容包括:各種旋轉生物盤組合程序之適合
處理廢水種類、最佳操作條件(廢水種類、有機負荷量、水力停留時間)
、共同適用反應動力參數之探討及其它組合程序相關條件之探討,最後將
對此一系列旋轉生物盤法組合程序進行實場應用潛力評估。由試驗結果顯
示: 各種旋轉生物盤組合程序處理含酚廢水時,當有機體積負荷在0.87
kg-COD/m3.day以下,厭氧串聯好氧旋轉生物盤法為較佳之組合程序,其
原因為有較佳之酚轉化率、酚COD去除率及甲烷產量;其餘依次為單相厭
氧旋轉生物盤法、好氧旋轉生物盤法及二相式厭氧旋轉生物盤法。當有機
體積負荷在0.87∼1.56 kg-COD/m3.day之間時,厭氧串聯好氧旋轉生物盤
法為較佳之組合程序,其原因為有較佳之酚轉化率、酚COD去除率及甲烷
產量;其餘依次為好氧旋轉生物盤法、單相厭氧旋轉生物盤法及二相式厭
氧旋轉生物盤法。 各種旋轉生物盤組合程序處理含合成有機廢水時,當
有機體積負荷在4.20kg-COD/m3.day以下,除二相式厭氧旋轉生物盤法有
較差之COD去除率及反應槽操作不易之缺點,其餘各種組合程序皆適合處
理此負荷下之合成有機廢水;因為單相厭氧旋轉生物盤法,其COD去除率
雖不及厭氧串聯好氧旋轉生物盤法和好氧旋轉生物盤法,但是有較易操作
技術之優點;厭氧串聯好氧旋轉生物盤法,雖有較佳之COD去除率,但藥
劑費高於好氧旋轉生物盤法,而操作技術則較單相厭氧旋轉生物盤法困難
;好氧旋轉生物盤法雖不能回收甲烷氣,但是其藥劑費低。當有機體積負
荷在4.20∼17.33 kg-COD/m3.day之間時,厭氧串聯好氧旋轉生物盤法為
較佳之組合程序,其原因為有較佳之COD去除率及甲烷產量;其餘依次為
好氧旋轉生物盤法、二相式厭氧旋轉生物盤法及單相厭氧旋轉生物盤法。
關鍵詞:組合程序、旋轉生物盤法、有機體積負荷

ABSTRACT The purpose of this study is
to evaluate the treatability of biodegradable organic
wastewaters and phenol wastewaters by four different kinds of
rotating biological contactor (RBC) processes include aerobic,
anaerobic, anaerobic-aerobic and two-phase anaerobic treatments.
Effects of different influent organic concentrations and
hydraulic retention times are investigated to find the optimal
operating conditions. The test results of phenol
wastewaters indicated that when operated at low phenol loading
rates (< 0.87 kg-COD/m3.day), the anaerobic-aerobic RBC process
is the best choice, and then anaerobic RBC, aerobic RBC and two-
phase anaerobic RBC (in that order). When operated at high
phenol loading rates (0.87-1.56 kg-COD/m3.day), the anaerobic-
aerobic RBC process is also the best choice, and then aerobic
RBC, anaerobic RBC and two-phase anaerobic RBC. The test
results of organic wastewaters indicated that when operated at
low organic loading rates (< 4.2 kg-COD/m3.day), the anaerobic-
aerobic RBC, aerobic RBC and anaerobic RBC are good choices.
When operated at high organic loading rates (4.2-17.33 kg-COD/
m3.day), the anaerobic-aerobic RBC process is also the best
choice, and then aerobic RBC, two-phase anaerobic RBC and
anaerobic RBC.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11455/5183
Appears in Collections:環境工程學系所

Show full item record
 

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.