Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11455/5237
標題: 綠建築評估指標應用在台中縣立大里高中 之實用性研究
A Study on Practicability of Applying Green Building Assessment Indices to Dali Senior High School, Taichung County
作者: 顏鳳如
Yen, Feng ju
關鍵字: green campus;綠校園;green building assessment indices;green schools;Dali Senior High School;綠建築評估指標;綠色學校;大里高中
出版社: 環境工程學系所
引用: 1. 大里高級中學興建高中教學大樓工程合約書(2003)。 2. 王希智,2002,綠建築中綠化及基地保水評估指標於國民中小學之應用-以新竹市為例,逢甲大學建築及都市計畫研究所碩士論文。 3. 江哲銘,永續綠色健康學校校園建築環境教材建立計畫,教育部研究計畫。 4. 江哲銘,2004,永續建築導論,建築情報。 5. 行政院,2002,挑戰2008:國加發展重點計劃(2002-2007) 。 6. 朱滢樹,2004,校園綠建築綠化指標之植栽CO2固定量調查研究----以大甲高中為例,國立雲林科技大學營建工程研究所碩士論文。 7. 林憲德主編,綠建築解說與評估手冊(2005年版),內政部建築研究所。 8. 林憲德主編,綠建築解說與評估手冊(2003年版),內政部建築研究所。 9. 林憲德主編,綠建築解說與評估手冊(1999年版),內政部建築研究所。 10. 林憲德主編,2000,綠建築技術彙編,內政部建築研究所。 11. 林憲德,1999,城鄉生態,詹氏書局。 12. 林憲德主編,2002,國民中小學綠建築設計手冊,內政部建築研究所。 13. 林憲德,2003,溼熱氣候的綠色建築,詹氏書局。 14. 林政賢,2004,綠建築評估指標適用性之研究,國立成功大學建築研究所碩 士論文。 15. 陳富強,2003,綠建築評估指標於南投縣921重建之國民中小學之應用,逢甲大學建築及都市計畫研究所碩士論文。 16. 教育部,2005,永續校園推廣計畫—水與綠的校園研習手冊。 17. 教育部,2004,永續環境教育工作坊行政主管研習實施計畫。 18. 黃世孟,2000,溣用後評估與建築設計之規劃研究。 19. 湯志民,2002,台灣的學校建築,五南文化。 20. 湯志民,1999,國民中學學校建築研究,五南文化。 21. 湯志民,2003,永續發展的校園與建築,中華民國學校建築研究學會。 22. 張玟蓁,2003,台中縣九二一震災國中校園重建景觀之研究,南華大學美學愈藝術管理研究所碩士論文。 23. 章錦瑜,1999,景觀植物(一)~(六) ,淑馨出版社。 24. 慈濟九二一希望工程-台中縣大里國中援建工程合約書(1999)。 25. 蕭火在,2004,國小學童對校園環境滿意度之探討,國立台中師範教育學院環境教育研究所碩士論文。 26. 內政部建築研究所網站,http://www.abri.gov.tw/。 27. 財團法人中華建築中心網站,http://www.cabc.org.tw/。 28. 台中縣立大里高中網頁,http://www.dljh.tcc.edu.tw/。 29. Moll,G..,(1987),"Improving the health of the urban forest,"American Forests,Vol.93, 61-64. 30. Taylor&Francis Group,(2002), "Cognitive structure and the affective domain:on knowing and feeling in biology,"International Journal of Science Education,.24(6),645-660
摘要: 
環境保護是21世紀的世界風潮,在地球環境負荷愈來愈重的情況下,許多人開始思考永續環境的真諦,過去不當的都市建築政策,使居住環境日漸惡化,為了緩和都市建築環境惡化的問題,以環保為導向的「綠建築」乃是建築政策上最有效的對策之ㄧ。綠建築並不僅指在建築環境上進行植栽綠化,而是指強調與地球環境共生共榮的建築環境設計,可積極定義為「生態、節能、減廢、健康的建築物」。
近年教育部綠色學校計畫的執行以及多所921災後重建學校的成功案例與綠建築的推動,將校園規劃建設由過去威權空間的傳統思維,轉換成多元、活潑、在地且生態化的現代校園,為能真正落實將環境覺知與環境行為融入校園生活之中,校園建築與其外部空間的改善應盡量考量「綠建築」與「綠校園」的設計準則,因此本研究探討教育部綠色學校計畫推動的新建校園之規劃設計與過去傳統單調的建築空間在使用上的差異及其實用性,以台中縣立大里高中為例研究綠建築評估指標應用於該校之具體成效,以及實際使用者對於新、舊建築之滿意度及其需求,以便能提供日後校園規劃之參考依據。
研究結果發現在綠建築評估指標方面,台中縣立大里高中在生物多樣性指標、綠化量指標及室內環境指標等三項指標皆符合綠建築評估之標準;而基地保水指標、水資源指標及污水垃圾改善等三項指標,則並未完全達到合格標準。在台中縣立大里高中師生對整體校園滿意度調查的具體成果為「南北向大樓的自然採光優於東西向」;「舊建築的福田樓及友情樓在通風效果及隔音效果上均優於新建築」;在校園整體感覺方面大部分項目滿意的比例皆高於不滿意的比例;「綜合而言我喜歡我的學校」,同意的佔65.7%,可知大部分師生對台中縣立大里高中是能認同的。師生滿意度比較上,教師的滿意度都高於學生;在學生的族群中又以一年級的滿意度最高,而六年級(高三)學生的滿意度最低。值得注意的是:不知道教育部推行「綠色學校」計畫的有60.8%;不知道綠校園規劃有「九大指標」的也佔80.9% ;不知道九大指標的內容的佔76.1%。可見教育部在推行「綠色學校」計畫的相關宣導工作上仍有相當的改善空間。

Environmental protection is a global trend in the 21st century. As environmental loading is getting heavier and heavier, many people start to think about the significance of a sustainable environment. Inappropriate urban building policies in the past worsen the living environment. To alleviate deteriorating problems of urban buildings, environment-based green buildings become one of the most effective measures. Green buildings not only include plantation and vegetation, but also emphasize the design of architectural environment that can coexist with the earth. A more positive definition would be ecological, energy saving, waste reduction and healthy buildings.
The green school plan implemented by the Ministry of Education for the past few years, successful cases of several reconstructed schools after the 921 earthquake and promotion of green buildings have converted a traditional thinking of an authoritative space in the past to diversified, energetic, local and ecological modern campus. To integrate environmental awareness and vehavior with campus life in a realistic way, buildings and exterior space improvement on campus should take the design principles of green buildings and green campus into consideration. The application differences and practicability between the newly built campus promoted by the green school project of the Ministry of Education and previous typical and monotonous architectural space will be explored in this research. Dali Senior High School, Taichung County will be served as an example for applying green building assessment indices to the specific performance and actual users' satisfaction and demand for new and old buildings for future reference of campus planning.
The study results show that biodiversity, green volume and indoor environment indices of Dali Senior High School, Taichung County meet green building evaluation standards; however, the site water retention (raining storage in building site), water resources and waste water and garbage improvement indices are not up to standards. According to the campus general satisfaction survey aimed at teachers and students of Dali Senior High School, Taichung County, ambient lighting of north/south-facing buildings is better than that of east/west-facing ones; old Fu-tien and You-cing Buildings are more superior to new buildings in ventilation and sound insulation. Most of the items about the general impression on campus reveal a higher satisfaction rate. 65.7% of the teachers and students agree to the statement that “I like my school as a whole.” It is obvious to know that most of the teachers and students identify themselves with the school. Teachers' satisfaction is higher than students', grade 7 students are the most satisfied with their school and the 9th graders have the least satisfaction. One thing that needs our attention is 60.8% of people have no idea about the green school plan promoted by the Ministry of Education, 80.9% do not know nine major indices of green campus planning and 76.1% are not aware of the contents of the nine major indices. As a result, the Ministry of Education is not effective in promoting the green school project.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11455/5237
其他識別: U0005-3006200616583600
Appears in Collections:環境工程學系所

Show full item record
 
TAIR Related Article

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.