Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
標題: 論《馬克白》中的家庭與政治:威廉‧莎士比亞、威廉‧戴夫南特爵士、以及尤金‧伊歐涅斯科
Exploring Family and Politics in Macbeth:William Shakespeare, Sir William Davenant, and Eugène Ionesco
作者: 吳燕諄
Wu, Yen-Chun
關鍵字: 莎士比亞;William Shakespeare;馬克白;家庭;政治;Macbeth;family;politics
出版社: 外國語文學系所
引用: Baldwin, Elaine, et al. Introducing Cultural Studies. 1st ed. England: Pearson, 2004. Print. Bartholomeusz, Dennis. Macbeth and the Players. London: Cambridge UP, 1969. Print. Bernthal, Craig A. “Treason in the Family: The Trial of Thumpe V. Horner.” Shakespeare Quarterly 42.1 (1991): 44-54. Print. Bonnefoy, Claude. Conversations with Eugene Ionesco. Trans. Jan Dawson. London: Faber, 1970. Print. Boswellstone, W. G.. “Macbeth.” Shakespeare’s Holinshed: The Chronicle and the Historical Plays Compared by W. G. Boswellstone. 2nd ed. 1896. London: Chatton and Windus, 1907. 18-45. Print. Brannigan, John. New Historicism and Cultural Materialism. London: Macmillan P, 1998. Print. Brantlinger, Patrick. Who Killed Shakespeare?: What’s Happened to English Since the Radical Sixties. London: Routledge, 2001. Print. Braunmuller, A.R., ed. Macbeth. The New Cambridge Shakespeare. 1997; 1998; 1999. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2001.Print. Brown, John Russell, ed. Focus on Macbeth. London: Routledge, 1982. Print. Carroll, William C. Introduction. Macbeth: Texts and Contexts. Ed. Carroll. Boston: Bedford/ St. Martin’s, 1999. 1-20. Print. Camus, Albert. The Myth of Sisyphus, and Other Essays. Trans. Justin O''Brien. Vintage International ed. New York: Vintage, 1991. Print. Chamberlain, Stephanie. “Fantasizing Infanticide: Lady Macbeth and the Murdering Mother in Early Modern England.” College Literature 32.3 (2005): 72-91. Print. Cookson, Linda, and Bryan Loughrey, eds. Macbeth, William Shakespeare. Harlow: Longman, 1988. Print. Copleston, Frederick S. J. Contemporary Philosophy: Studies of Logical Positivism and Existentialism. Westminster, MD: Newman P, 1956. Print. Crowell, Steven. “Existentialism,” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Ed. Edward N. Zalta. Stanford U, 11 Oct. 2011. Web. 21 Feb. 2011. D’Avenant, William, Sir. Macbeth. Spencer 33-107. Print. Esslin, Martin. The Theatre of the Absurd. 3rd ed. New York: Vintage, 2004. Print. Evans, G.. Blakemore, ed. Elizabethan-Jacobean Drama: A New Mermaid Background Book. London: A & C Black, 1988. Print. Frye, Roland Mushat. “Macbeth’s Usurping Wife.” Renaissance News 8.2 (1955): 102-05. Print. Gaunt, Peter. The British Wars, 1637-1651. London: Routledge, 1997. Print. ---. Oliver Cromwell. 1996. Oxford: Blackwell, 1997. Print. Greenblatt, Stephen, et al, eds. The Norton Shakespeare: Based on the Oxford Edition. 1997. 2nd ed. New York: Norton, 2008. Print. ---. Introduction. Macbeth. Greenblatt 2569-78. Print. Hamilton, Susanna. “‘The Charm’s Wound Up’: Reference Back in Macbeth.” English: The Journal of the English Association 35.152 (1986): 113-19. Print. Harrison, William. The Description of England: The Classic Contemporary Account of Tudor Social Life. New York: Cornell UP, 1968. Ed. Georges Edelen. New York: Dover, 1994. Print. Hawkins, Michael. “History, Politics, and Macbeth.” Brown 155-88. Print. Holland, Peter, ed. Shakespeare Survey 57: Macbeth and Its Afterlife. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2004. Print. Howard, Jean E. “Shakespearean History.” The Norton Shakespeare: Based on the Oxford Edition. 2nd ed. Ed. Stephen Greenblatt, et al. New York: Norton, 2009. 579-91. Print. Howe, Elizabeth. The First English Actresses: Women and Drama 1660-1700. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1992. Print. Ionesco, Eugène. “Discovering the Theatre.” Trans. Leonard C. Pronko. The Tulane Drama Review 4.1 (1959): 3-18. JSTOR. Web. 19 March 2011. ---. Fragments of a Journal. Trans. Jean Stewart. London: Quartet Books,1987. Print. ---. Macbett. Exit the King, The Killer, and Macbett: Three Plays by Eugène Ionesco. Trans. Charles Marowitz and Donald Watson. New York: Grove P, 1973. 1-105. Print. ---. Present Past Past Present: A Personal Memoir. Trans. Helen R. Lane. New York: Grove P, 1971. Print. Jacob, James R. and Timothy Raylor. “Opera and Obedience: Thomas Hobbes and ‘A Proposition for Advancement of Moralitie’ by Sir William Davenant.” Seventeenth Century 6.2 (1991): 205-250. Print. Johnson, Ben. “To the memory of my beloved, the Author, Mr. William Shakespeare: And What He Has Left Us.” The Norton Facsimile: The First Folio of Shakespeare. Prep. Charlton Hinman. 2nd ed. London: Norton, 1996. 9-10. Print. Kavenik, Frances M. British Drama, 1660-1779: A Critical History. New York: Twayne, 1995. Print. Keylor, William R. The Twentieth-century World and Beyond: An International History Since 1900. 5th ed. New York: Oxford UP, 2006. Print. King of England, James I. Basilikon Doron, Or His Maiesties Instrvctions to His Dearest Sonne, Henry the Prince. 1616. Rpt. in. The Political Works of James I. Intro. Charles Howard Mcilwain. 1918. New Jersey: Lawbook Exchange, 2006. 3-52. Print. ---. The Earle of Gowries Conspiracie against the Kings Maiestie of Scotland: At Saint John-Stoun vpon Tuesday the Fift of Augusts. 1600. London, 1600. EEBO. Web. 23 Oct. 2011. ---. The Trve Lawe of Free Monarchies: Or the Reciprock and Mutuall Duetie betwixt a Free King and His Naturall Subiects. Minor Prose Works of King James VI and I. Ed. James Craigie. Edinburgh : Scottish Text Society, 1982. 59-82. Print. Kliman, Bernice W. Macbeth. 2nd ed. Manchester: Manchester UP, 2004. Print. Kozikowski, Stanley J. “The Gowrie Conspiracy Against James VI: A New Source for Shakespeare’s Macbeth.” Shakespeare Studies 13 (1980): 197-212. Print. Kroll, Richard. “Emblem and Empiricism in Davenant’s Macbeth.” ELH 57.4 (1990): 835-64. Print. Lamont, Rosette C. “From Macbeth to Macbett.” Modern Drama 15.3 (1972): 231-253. Print. ---. Ionesco’s Imperatives: The Politics of Culture. Ann Arbor: U of Michigan, 1993. Print. Lane, Nancy. Understanding Eugène Ionesco. Columbia: U of South Carolina P, 1994. Print. Lemon, Rebecca. “Sovereignty and Treason in Macbeth.” Moschovakis 74-87. Print. Maguire, Nancy Klein. “Tragicomedy.” The Cambridge Companion to English Restoration Theatre. Ed. Deborah Payne Fisk. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2000. 86-106. Print. McLaren, Angus. Twentieth-Century Sexuality: A History. Oxford: Blackwell, 1999. NetLibrary. Web. 9 Feb. 2011. Mills, Christopher. “The Relationship between Macbeth and Lady Macbeth.” Cookson and Loughrey 48-59. Print. Mitterauer, Michael, and Reinhard Sieder. The European Family: Patriarchy to Partnership from the Middle Ages to the Present. Trans. Karla Oosterveen and Manfred Hörzinger. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1982. Print. Morse, Ruth. “Monsieur Macbeth: From Jarry to Ionesco.” Holland 112-125. Print. Moschovakis, Nick. “Introduction: Dualistic Macbeth? Problematic Macbeth?” Moschovakis 1-72. Print. Moschovakis, Nick, ed. Macbeth: New Critical Essays. New York: Routledge, 2008. Print. Moseley, Charles. “Macbeth’s free fall.” Cookson and Loughrey 23-33. Print. Mullaney, Steven. “Lying Like Truth: Riddle, Representation and Treason in Renaissance England.” ELH. 47.1 (1980): 32-47. Print. Munro, John, rev. ed. The Shakespeare Allusion-Book: A Collection of Allusions to Shakespeare from 1591 to 1700. 1909. Originally ed. C. M. Ingleby, L. Toulmin Smith, and F. J. Furnivall. Vol. 2. New York: Libraries P, 1970. Print. Norbrook, David. “Macbeth and the Politics of Historiography.” Politics of Discourse: The Literature and History of Seventeenth-Century England. Ed. Kevin Sharpe and Steven N. Zwicker. London: U of California. 78-116. Print. ---. “The Reformation of the Masque.” The Court Masque. Ed. David Lindley. Manchester: Manchester UP, 1984. 94-110. Print. Plant, David “Charles, Prince of Wales, (King Charles II), 1630-85.” British Civil Wars, Commonwealth and Protectorate, 1638-60. N.p. 9 Oct. 2007. Web. 1 Jan. 2011. Potter, Lois. “Towards a ‘Reformed’ Stage.” The Revels History of Drama in English. Gen. ed. Potter. Vol. 4. London: Routledge, 1983. 204-304. Print. Rowe, Katherine. “Humoral Knowledge and Liberal Cognition in Davenant’s Macbeth.” Reading the Early Modern Passions: Essays in the Cultural History of Emotion. Ed. Gail Kern Paster, Katherine Rowe and Mary Floyd-Wilson. Pennsylvania: U of Pennsylvania P, 2004. 169-191. Print. Seel, G. E. The English Wars and Republic, 1637-1660. London; New York: Routledge, 1999. Print. Selden, Roman, and Peter Widdowson, and Peter Brooker. A Reader’s Guide to Contemporary Literary Theory. 5th ed. New York: Pearson Longman, 2005. Print. Shakespeare, William. Macbeth. Greenblatt 2579-2632. Print. Sinfield, Alan. “Macbeth: History, Ideology and Intellectuals.” Critical Quarterly 28.1-2 (1986): 63-77. Print. Spencer, Christopher, ed. Five Restoration Adaptations of Shakespeare. Urbana: U of Illinois P, 1965. Print. ---. Introduction. Spencer 1-32. Print. Stallybrass, Peter. “Macbeth and Witchcraft.” Brown 189-209. Print. Stone, Lawrence. The Family, Sex and Marriage in England 1500-1800. Abr. ed. New York: Harper, 1977. Print. Tanács, Ágenes Tünde. “Corporeality in Shakespeare’s and Davenant’s Versions of Macbeth.” Shakespeare and His Collaborations over the Centuries. Ed. Pavel Drábek, Klára Kolinská and Matthew Nicholls. Newcastle: CSP, 2008. 119-28. Print. Taylor, Gary. Reinventing Shakespeare: A Cultural History from the Restoration to the Present. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1989. Print. Thomson, Peter. Shakespeare’s Theatre. 2nd ed. London: Routledge, 1992. Print. Warnock, Mary. Existentialism. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1989. Print. Williams, Simon. “Taking Macbeth out of Himself: Davenant, Garrick, Schiller and Verdi.” Holland 54-68. Print. Wrightson, Keith. English Society 1580-1680. New Brunswick: Rutgers UP, 1982. Print.

Most of William Shakespeare’s masterpieces have been repeatedly recreated and explored, so they appear to be for all time. Since the twentieth century, although Shakespearean studies have been gradually marginalized in higher educational institutions, Shakespearean works have been more frequently commercialized in public. In this regard, this thesis takes Macbeth as an example to examine whether there are some elements which allow the Bard’s major plays not only to mirror his time but also leave space for later generations to develop and adapt into their own social contexts. .
As part of cultural studies, this thesis is an interdisciplinary research on the issues of family and politics in three versions of Macbeth, including Shakespeare’s original Macbeth, Sir William Davenant’s Restoration Macbeth, and Eugène Ionesco’s modern Macbett. Combining historical study with textual analysis, this thesis is made of five chapters. For Introduction, it lays out the thesis’s framework together with its topic and issues as well as the approaches this study employs. Chapter One interprets Macbeth as a play torn between family and politics and explores the connection between Shakespeare’s England and the world in the play. Chapter Two reads Davenant’s adaptation as a story of war, usurpation, and restoration to examine how this seventeenth-century playwright depicted his society and realized his writing aim by means of reproduction of Macbeth. Chapter Three moves to Ionesco’s Macbett, a representative of the Theatre of the Absurd in the twentieth century; this chapter, with reference to the absurdities in the Bard’s Macbeth, probes into why an early modern drama is able to be adapted to represent the postwar world in the twentieth century. Finally, given that Macbeth touches on the issues of family and politics which have their own hierarchical power structures and could be widely applied, this thesis concludes that a play like Macbeth can represent Shakespeare’s days and be adapted into different social contexts.
其他識別: U0005-2708201218594500
Appears in Collections:外國語文學系所

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat Existing users please Login
nchu-101-7097012015-1.pdf507.57 kBAdobe PDFThis file is only available in the university internal network    Request a copy
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.