Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11455/74711
標題: 《天祿琳琅》續編本寒山、拾得詩辨偽
作者: 葉珠紅
關鍵字: 寒山子詩集序;Preface of Han-shan-zi-peom;天祿宋本;寒山;拾得;collection;Tien-lu version in Sung Dynasty;Han-shan;Shih-te
出版社: 臺中市:國立中興大學文學院
Project: 興大人文學報, Volume 37, Page(s) 165-185.
摘要: 
??研究?得詩的學者,一致的看法是:一、?得詩第29首〈少?學書劍〉,乃寒山詩誤收入?得詩;二、對於各版本存詩?目?一的?得詩(有43、54、56、57首),均認為其中夾雜有後人的偽作。《天?琳琅》續編《寒山子詩一卷附豐干?得詩一卷》(本文簡稱《天?》宋本),是目前公認收寒山、?得詩最全,最好的版本,共收?得詩54首;《天?》宋本在?得詩第39首〈我?出家人〉,詩後有小字注:「下五首與前長偈語?同」;第44首〈般?酒泠泠〉,詩後有小字注:「此下與寒山詩大同小?,語意相涉」,目前研究?得詩的學者,均未針對《天?》宋本這??原注,關係到真正的?得詩,究竟有多少首,作全面的討?。本文擬針對《天?》宋本的??原注,以及《天?》宋本所收的寒山詩、?得詩,試探有哪些詩並非?得之作。

The same viewpoints from the scholars throughout the ages who studied HAN-SHAN-POEM are: 1. Poem No. 29 of SHISH-TE POEM (Knowledge and martial art for youths), were originally belonging to HAN-SHAN-POEM but was by mistake to be edited into the SHIH-TE-POEM; 2. With regard to SHIH-TE-POEM, in the different versions, it was existing the problem that varied on poem number, such as poem No. 43, 54, 56, 57, all of them thought that SHIH-TE-POEM were mixed with some forging works written by later age. The continued edition of (TIEN-LU-LIN-LANG), (FEN-KAN-SHIH-TE-POEM in HAN-SHAN-POEM) (called for short, (TIEN-LU) version of Sung Dynasty), are up to now recognized that are the best and complete version to collect HAN-SHAN-POEM, SHIH-TE-POEM, it was totally to contain 54 poems. The TIEN-LU in the version of Sung Dynasty, below the poem No. 39 (the monks that I saw). There was a note in small characters (The next 5 poems are the same as the front sentence of CHANG-CHIEH, and belong the poem No. 44 (Wine is cold in POJER), there was a note in small characters: (The followings are similar to HAN-SHAN-POEM and its meaning is concerned in each other.), The present scholars to study HAN-SHAN-POEM and SHIH-TE-POEM, all of them fail to discuss completely the two phrases in TIEN-LU of the version in Song Dynasty, which is really connecting with SHIH-TE-POEM, how many poems were belonging to the original explanation. This essay attempts to study based on these two phrase in TIEN-LU of the version in Sung Dynasty which poems between SHIH-TE-POEM were not written by SHIH-TE.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11455/74711
Appears in Collections:第37期
文學院

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat Existing users please Login
141605-6.pdf1.17 MBAdobe PDFThis file is only available in the university internal network   
Show full item record
 
TAIR Related Article

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.