Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11455/81177
標題: 素食者對大豆加工品食品添加物知覺之研究-以佛教醫院為例
The Acknowledgement of Additives Supplements of Soybean Product For Vegetarians-- Examples of a Buddhist Regional Hospital
作者: 黃惠霖
Huang, Hui-Lin
關鍵字: 大豆加工品;Soybean Product;食品添加物;知覺;Food Additives;Acknowledgement
出版社: 農業企業經營管理碩士在職專班
引用: 中文文獻 1. 吳明隆,2011。「SPSS統計應用學習實務:問卷分析與應用統計」,台北:易習圖書 2. 法蘭西斯‧拉佩(Frances Moore Lappe) 與安娜‧拉佩(Anna Lappe),2007。「一座小星球的飲食」,大塊文化。 3. 洪心瑜,1999。「這樣吃素可以更健康」。台北:宇河文化出版有限公司。 4. 曾浩洋等,2011。「 食品衛生與安全」,華格納企業有限公司。 5. 謝宜芳,1998。「健康素得來」,華視文化公司。 6. 陳佳蓉、陳國勝,2010。「民眾對食品添加物的認知、知覺風險及風險減輕策略研究」,『休閒保健期刊』,115-126。 7. 蕭惠文等,1998。「市售豆類製品中過氧化氫亞硫酸鹽及硼酸及其鹽類之調查」,『藥物食品檢驗局調查研究年報』。16期,152-157。 8. 王燕英,2010。「素食者生活型態與素食採用行為之關係」,高雄師範大學人力與知識管理研究所碩士論文。 9. 呂明諭,2010。「遊客生態旅遊認知與知覺價值、滿意度之關係─以巴庫拉斯生態農場為例」,明道大學產業創新與經營學系碩士論文。 10. 李靜華,2002。「台北市青少年對食品標示的知識、態度、及其相關選購行為研究」, 臺灣師範大學家政教育研究所碩士論文。 11. 李蘭、潘文涵、葉文婷,1998,國民營養現況:1993-1996國民營養健康狀況變遷調查結果,台北:行政院衛生署。 12. 林茂興,2002。「以生活型態區隔台北地區ADSL消費者對多媒體服務接受意願之研究」,交通大學經營管理研究所碩士論文。 13. 林淑真,2001。「生活型態與購買涉入對品牌權益的影響研究-以電子字典為例」,政治大學廣告學系碩士論文。 14. 張瓈文,2005。「液相層析串聯質譜儀鑑別大豆類素食加工食品中摻雜動物性油脂」,清華大學化學系研究所碩士論文。 15. 郭淑雲,2001。「消費者特性與網際網路購物意願關係之研究─以生鮮食品為例」,中興大學行銷學系研究所碩士論文。 16. 陳育棠,2004。「網站環境之認知、情感對消費者態度及行為意圖之影響─以農產品網站為例」,中興大學行銷學系研究所碩士論文。 17. 黃惠煐,2007。「大豆異黃酮素對更年期症狀改善之影響」,台北醫學大學藥學研究所未出版論文。 18. 蕭增寶,2011。「臺灣素食加工食品安全與攙偽管理之研究」,海洋大學食品科學系研究所碩士論文。 19. 行政院衛生署統計室網站十大死因結果統計分析。 英文文獻 1. Ajzen, I., 1985,. "From intentions to Actions: A theory of planned behavior." in Kuhl, I. J. & Beckman, J. (eds.), Action-control: From congnition to behavior. Berlin: Springer-Verlang, 11-39. 2. Dwyer, J. T., 1988,. "Health aspects of vegetarian diets," American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 48:712-738. 3. Marchant, M. A., Fang, C., and Song, B., 2002,."Issues on adoption, import regulations, and policies for biotech commodities in China with a focus on soybeans." AgBioForum, 5:167-174. 4. McAthur,L.,Chamberlain,V.,&Howard,A.B.,2001,."Behaviors, attitudes, and knowledge of low-income consumers regarding nutrition labels."J Health Care Poor Underserved, 12(4), 415-428. 5. Messina MJ,Persky V,Setchell KD,Branes S.1994. "Soy intake and cancer risk: a revies of the in vitro and in vivo data." Nutr Cancer 21:113-131. 6. Neisser, U., 1967,. "Cognitive psychology". Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey-Crofts. 7. Michael Allen Fox., 2005. 王瑞香譯。深層素食主義,台北:關懷生命協會。 8. Blanchard, C. M., Fisher, J., Sparling, P. B., and Shanks, T. H., 2009,. "Understanding Adherence to 5 servings of Fruits and Vegetables per Day: A Theory of Planned Behavior Perspective. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior", 41(1). 9. Joseph, T. P. 1974."The concept and application of life style segmentation."Journal of Marketing, Vol38,33-37. 10. http://hydrogen-peroxide.org/
摘要: 
食品添加物(food additives)為常見添加物,而素食者(vegetarian)不論是為宗教、為健康、或為發願等等因素在飲食選擇上就較一般民眾來得受限,往往僅能選擇大豆類或其加工品為蛋白質營養來源,而廠商在產品製造過程常為了增加儲藏期限添加具防腐性質的食品添加物。食用過量的防腐添加物容易造成消費者健康損害,可能違背素食者堅守素食的初衷。本研究以消費者生活型態分析架構為基礎,分析消費者知覺與其人口統計變數關係,所訪問的食品添加物包括過氧化氫、亞硫酸鹽及硼砂三種常見添加物為主,主要探討重點包括:
(一)探討素食者對大豆類加工品食品添加物的知覺。
(二)探討不同人口統計變數在大豆類加工品食品添加物的影響是否有差異。
針對台灣中部慈濟佛教醫院之員工及志工為對象,抽樣發放問卷120份,得到有效問卷87份。本研究發現:在三項訪問標的物中有過氧化氫、亞硫酸鹽及硼砂,受訪者對其中的亞硫酸鹽及硼砂具有較高知覺;在人口統計變項中,年齡對食品添加物知覺有顯著差異;個人月所得對食品添加物知覺具顯著差異。本研究建議應加強對年齡較輕及收入較低對象推廣對大豆類食品添加物之認識。

Food additives are very usual ingredient in food products. It is unfor-tunately that vegetarian can only choose limited target foods due to religious, health, or personal-will reasons. Soybean products are the main source of protein intake while the manufacturer of those products would extend the expiration period by adding additives. In-taking too much of preservative additives may damage human health which is against initial purpose of diet for vegetarians.
This study bases on consumer living style structure as fundamental analytical framework to explore consumers’ acknowledgement of three ad-ditives including Hydrogen Peroxide,Sulfite ,Boric acid in three different soybean products such as dried and fresh bean curds. Main findings will focus on consumer acknowledgment on the additives and the impacts of demographic factors on the acknowledgement.
We made questionnaire survey to employees and volunteers inside central branch of Tzuchi Buddhist Regional Hospital. Total samples are 120 with only 87 effective sets of data to this study. The research results show that survey responsers believe that the three bean products do contain as-sumed additives. Sulfite and Boric acid are the two additives with higher levels of acknowledgment. Age and income are two important factors af-fecting the acknowledgment difference of additives. Thus, we suggest that the government should work more on the knowledge diffusion to younger and lower income consumers about the right attitude towards food additives for safer food intakes.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11455/81177
其他識別: U0005-2607201316020600
Appears in Collections:農業暨自然資源學院

Show full item record
 

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.