Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
標題: Study the roosting behavior of melon fly, Bactrocera cucurbitae
作者: 田均如
Jun-Ru Tien
關鍵字: Bactrocera cucurbitae;roosting behavior;Ricinus communis L.;horizontal placement;瓜實蠅;停棲行為;停棲比率;蓖麻;水平放置
引用: Agarwal ML, Sharma DD and Rahman O. 1987. Melon fruit fly and its control. Indian Horticulture 32: 10-11. Akhtaruzzaman M, Alam MZ and Ali-Sardar MM. 1999. Suppressing fruit fly infestation by bagging cucumber at different days after anthesis. Bangladesh Journal of Entomology 9: 103-112. Akhtaruzzaman M. Alam MZ and Ali-Sardar MM. 2000. Efficiency of different bait sprays for suppressing fruit fly on cucumber. Bulletin of the Institute of Tropical Agriculture, Kyushu University 23: 15-26. Allwood, AJ, Chinajaryawong A, Drew RAI, Hamacek EL, Hancock DL, Hengsawad C, Jipanin JC, Jirasurat M, Krong CK, Kritsaneepaiboon S, Leong CTS and Vijaysegaran S. 1999. Host plant records for fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) in southeast Asia. Raffles Bulletin of Zoology, Supplement 7: 1-92. Aluja M, Jiménez A, Camino M, Piñero J, Aldana L, Castrejón V, and Valdés ME. 1997. Habitat manipulation to reduce papaya fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) damage: orchard design, use of trap crops and border trapping. J Econ Entomol 90: 1567-1576. Barry JD, Miller NW, Pin˜ero JC, Tuttle A, Mau RFL and Vargas RI. 2006. Effectiveness of protein baits on melon fly and oriental fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae): attraction and feeding. J Econ Entomol 99: 1161-1167. Bhatnagar KN and Yadava SRS. 1992. An insecticidal trial for reducing the damage of some cucurbitaceous fruits due to Dacus cucubitae Coq. Indian Journal of Entomology 54: 66-69. Borah RK. 1998. Evaluation of an insecticide schedule for the control of red pumpkin beetle and melon fruit fly on red pumpkin in the hills zone of Assam. Indian Journal of Entomology 60: 417-419. Burns RE, Harris DL, Moreno DS and Eger JE. 2001. Efficacy of spinosad bait sprays to control Mediterranean and Caribbean fruit flies in commercial citrus in Florida. Florida Entomol 84: 672-678. Chowdhury MK, Malapert JC and Hosanna MN. 1993. Efficiency of poison bait trap in controlling fruit fly, Dacus cucurbitae in bitter gourd. Bangladesh Journal of Entomology 3: 91-92. Christenson LD and Foote RH. 1960. Biology of fruit flies. Annual Review of Entomology 5: 171-192. Chughtai CG and Baloch VK. 1988. Insecticidal control of melon fruit fly. Pakistan Journal of Entomological Research 9: 192-194. Claudia D, Mathis S and Feichtinger G. 2014. A new visual trap for Rhagoletis cerasi (L.) (Diptera: Tephritidae). Insects 5: 564-576. Clausen CP, Clancy DW and Chock QC. 1965. Biological control of the oriental fruit fly (Dacus dorsalis Hendel) and other fruit flies in Hawaii. US Dep Agric Tech Bull. pp 1322. Cornelius ML, Duan JJ and Messing RH. 1999. Visual stimuli and the response of female oriental fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) to fruit-mimicking traps. J Econ Entomol 92: 121-129. Cunningham, RT and Steiner LF. 1972. Field trial of cue-lure + naled on saturated fiberboard blocks for control of the melon fly by the male-annihilation technique. J Econ Entomol 65: 505-507. Dhillon MK, Singh R, Naresh JS and Sharma HC. 2005. The melon fruit fly, Bactrocera cucurbitae: A review of its biology and management. J Insect Sci 5: 40-55. Doharey KL. 1983. Bionomics of fruit flies (Dacus spp.) on some fruits. Indian Journal of Entomology 45: 406-413. Fang MN. 1989. Studies on using different bagging materials for controlling melon fly on bitter gourd and sponge gourd. Bulletin of Taichung District Agriculture Improvement Station 25: 3-12. Fletcher BS. 1987. The biology of Dacine fruit flies. Annual Review of Entomology 32: 115-144. Fletcher MT and Kitching W. 1995. Chemistry of fruit flies. Chem Rev 95:789-828. Gupta JN and Verma AN. 1978. Screening of different cucurbit crops for the attack of the melon fruit fly, Dacus cucurbitae Coq. (Diptera: Tephritidae). Haryana Journal of Horticulture Science 7: 78-82. Gupta TN and Verma AN. 1982. Effectiveness of Fenitrothion bait sprays against melon fly, Dacus cucurbitae, in bittergourd. Indian J Agr Res 16: 41-46. Hagen KS, Finney GL. 1950. A food supplement for effectively increasing the fecundity of certain tephritid species. J Econ Entomol 43: 735. Hardy DE. 1979. Review of economic fruit flies of the South Pacific Region. Pac Insects 20: 429-432. Hollingsworth R, Vagalo M and Tsatsia F. 1997. Biology of melon fly, with special reference to Solomon Islands. In: Allwood AJ, Drew RAI (eds). Management of fruit flies in the Pacific. ACIAR Proceedings, Australian. pp 267. Howlett F. 1912. The effect of oil of citronella on two species of Dacus. Trans Royal Entomol Soc Lond 60:412-418. IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency). 2003. Trapping guidelines for area-wide fruit fly programmes. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna. pp 47. Iwahashi O and Majima T. 1986. Lek formation and male-male competition in the melon fly, Dacus cucurbitae Coquillett : Diptera : Tephritidae. Appl Entomol Zool 21: 70-75. Jang EB, Carvalho LA and Stark JD. 1997. Attraction of female oriental fruit fly, Bactrocera dorsalis to volatile semiochemicals from leaves and extracts of a nonhost plant, Panax (Polyscias guilfoylei) in laboratory and olfactometer assays. J Chem Ecol 23:1389-1401. Jang EB and Light DM. 1996. Olfactory semiochemicals of tephritids. In: McPheron BA, Steck GJ (eds). Fruit fly pests: a world assessment of their biology and management. St. Lucie Press, Delray Beach, pp 73-90. Kazi AS. 1976. Studies on the field habits of adult melon fruit fly Dacus (Strumeta) cucurbitae, Coquillet. Pakistan Journal of Science and Industrial Research 19: 71-76. King JR and Hennessey MK. 1996. Spinosad bait for the Caribbean fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae). Florida Entomol 79: 526-531. Klungness LM, Jang EB, Mau RFL, Vargas RI, Sugano JS and Fujitani E. 2005. New sanitation techniques for controlling Tephritid Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Hawaii. Journal of Applied Science and Environmental Management 9: 5-15. Koyama J, Kakinohana H and Miyatake T. 2004. Eradication of the melon fly, Bactrocera Cucurbitae, in Japan: importance of behavior, ecology, genetics, and evolution. Annu Rev Entomol 49: 331-349. Koyama J, Teruya T and Tanaka K. 1984. Eradication of the oriental fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) from the Okinawa Islands by a male annihilation method. J Econ Entomol 77:468-472. Kuba H and Koyama J. 1985. Mating behavior of wild melon flies, Dacus cucurbitae Coquillett (Diptera: Tephritidae) in a field cage: courtship behavior. Appl Entomol Zool 20:365-372. Kuba H and Itô Y. 1993. Remating inhibition in the melon fly, Bactrocera (=Dacus) cucurbitae (Diptera: Tephritidae): copulation with spermless males inhibits female remating. J Ethol 11: 23 - 28. Kushwaha KS, Pareek BL and Noor A. 1973. Fruit fly damage in cucurbits at Udaipur. Udaipur University Research Journal 11: 22-23. Lall BS and Sinha SN. 1959. On the biology of the melon fly, Dacus cucurbitae (Coq.) (Diptera: Tephritidae). Science & Culture 25: 159-161. Liu J, Yuan H, Wamg J, Pan T and Lan M. 2013. Ricinine content in different parts of Ricinus communis and its insecticidal activity. Chinese Journal of Pesticide Science 15: 239-242. McQuate GT. 2010. Tephritid fruit fly populations in a dragonfruit orchard in Hawaii: border plant use and infestation rate. Hawaiian Entomological Society 42: 41-48. McQuate GT, Jones GD and Sylva CD. 2003. Assessment of corn pollen as a food source for two tephritid fruit fly species. Environ Entomol 32:141-150. McQuate GT and Vargas RI. 2007. Assessment of attractiveness of plants as roosting sites for the melon fly, Bactrocera cucurbitae, and oriental fruit fly, Bactrocera dorsalis. Journal of Insect Science 7:57. Mishra PN and Singh MP. 1999. Studies on the ovicidal action of diflubenzuron on the eggs of Dacus (Bactrocera) cucurbitae Coq. damaging cucumber. Annals of Plant Protection Science 7: 94-96. Nakamori H, Nishimura M and Kakinohana H. 1988. Eradication of the oriental fruit fly, Dacus dorsalis Hendel (Diptera: Tephiritidae), from Miyako and Yaeyama Islands by the male annihilation method. In: Vijaysegaran S, Ibrahim AG (eds). Fruit flies in the Tropics: proceedings of the first International Symposium. Malaysian Agricultural Research and Development Institute, Kuala Lumpur. pp 220-231. Narayanan ES. 1953a. Seasonal pests of crops. Indian Farming 3: 8-11. Narayanan ES. 1953b. Seasonal pests of crops. Indian Farming 3: 29-31. Narayanan ES and Batra HN. 1960. Fruit flies and their control. Indian Council of Agricultural Research. New Delhi, India. pp 1-68. Newell IW, Mitchell WC and Rathburn FL. 1952. Infestation norms for Dacus cucurbitae in Momordica balsamina and seasonal differences in activity of the parasite, Opius fletcheri. Hawaiian Entomological Society 148: 497-508. Nishida T. 1955. Natural enemies of the melon fly, Dacus curcubitae Coq. in Hawaii. Ann Entomol Soc Am 48: 171-178. Nishida T. 1963. Zoogeographical and ecological studies of Dacus cucurbitae (Diptera: Tephritidae) in India. Hawaii Agricultural Experiment Station, University of Hawaii. pp 28. Nishida T, Bess HA and Ota A. 1957. Comparative effectiveness of malathion and malathion yeast hydrolysate bait sprays for control of melon fly. J Econ Entomol 50: 682-684. Pawar DB, Mote UN and Lawande KE. 1991. Monitoring of fruit fly population in bitter gourd crop with the help of lure trap. Journal of Research (Maharashtra Agricultural Universities) 16: 281. Peck SL and Mcquate GT. 2000. Field tests of environmentally friendly malathion replacements to suppress wild Mediterranean fruit fly populations. J Econ Entomol 93: 280-289. Pérez SD, Todd ES and Boaz Y. 2012. Female mating failure and the failure of 'mating' in sterile insect programs. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 146: 66 - 78. Piñero JC, Mau RFL, McQuate GT and Vargas RI. 2009. Novel bait stations for attract-and-kill of pestiferous fruit flies. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 133: 208–216. Prokopy RJ, Miller NW, Piñero JC, Oride L, Chaney N, Revis H and Vargas RI. 2004. How effective is GF-120 fruit fly bait spray applied to border area sorghum plants for control of melon flies (diptera: tephritidae). Florida Entomologist 87: 354-360. Purcell MF, Stark JD and Messing RH. 1994. Insecticide effect on three tephritid fruit flies and associated braconid parasitoids in Hawaii. Entomological Society of America 87: 1455-1462. Quilici S, Atiama-Nurbel T and Bre´vault T. 2014. Plant odors as fruit fly attractants. In: Shelly T, Epsky N, Jang EB, Reyes-Flores J, Vargas R (eds). Trapping and the detection, control, and regulation of Tephritid fruit flies. Springer Science, USA. pp 119-144. Rabindranath K and Pillai KS. 1986. Control of fruit fly of bitter gourd using synthetic pyrethroids. Entomon 11: 269-272. Rajamannar N. 1962. Growth, orientation and feeding behavior of the larva of melon fly, Dacus cucurbitae on various plants. Proc Inst Sci India B 28: 133-142. Ranganath HR, Suryanarayana MA and Veenakumari K. 1997. Management of melon fly (Bactrocera (Zeugodacus) cucurbitae in cucurbits in South Andaman. Insect Environment 3: 32-33. Reddy AV. 1997. Evaluation of certain new insecticides against cucurbit fruit fly (Dacus cucurbitae Coq.) on bitter gourd. Annals of Agricultural Research 18: 252-254. Singh SV, Mishra A, Bisan RS, Malik YP and Mishra A. 2000. Host preference of red pumpkin beetle, Aulacophora foveicollis and melon fruit fly, Dacus cucurbitae. Indian Journal of Entomology 62: 242-246. Stark JD. 1995. Nocturnal behavior of oriental fruit flies and melon flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) and associated parasitoids in a commercial papaya growing region on Kaua'i, Hawaii. Hawaiian Entomological Society 32: 149-151. Stark JD, Vargas R and Miller N. 2004. Toxicity of spinosad in protein bait to three economically important tephritid fruit fly species (Diptera: Tephritidae) and their parasitoids (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). J Econ Entomol 97: 911-915. Steiner LF. 1955. Bait sprays for fruit fly control. Hawaiian Entomol Soc 5: 601-607. Stonehouse J, Afzal M, Zia Q, Mumford J, Poswal A and Mahmood R. 2002. Single-killing point field assessment of bait and lure control of fruit flies in Pakistan. Crop Prot 21: 651-659. Thomas C and Jacob S. 1990. Bioefficacy and residue dynamics of carbofuran against the melon fruit fly, Dacus cucurbitae Coq. infesting bitter gourd, Momordica charantia L. in Kerala. Journal of Entomological Research 14: 30-34. Todd ES. 2001. Lek size and female visitation in two species of tephritid fruit flies. Animal Behaviour 62: 33-40. Vargas RI, Mau RFL, Jang EB, Faust RM and Wong L. 2008. The Hawaii fruit fly areawide pest management programme. In: Koul O, Cuperus GW, Elliott NC (eds). Areawide Pest Management: Theory to Implementation. CABI Publishing, UK. pp 300-325. Vargas RI, Mau RFL, Stark JD, Pin˜ ero JC., Leblanc L, and Souder SK. 2010. Evaluation of methyl eugenol and cue-lure traps with solid lure and insecticide dispensers for fruit fly monitoring and male annihilation in the Hawaii areawide pest management program. J Econ Entomol 103: 409-415. Vargas RI, Peck SL, McQuate GT, Jackson CG, Stark JD and Armstrong JW. 2001. Potential for areawide integrated management of Mediterranean fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) with a braconid parasitoid and a novel bait spray. J Econ Entomol 94: 817-825. White IM and Elson-Harris MM. 1992. Fruit flies of economic significance: their identification and bionomics. CABI, Wallingford, UK. pp 601. Willard HF 1920. Opius fletcheri as a parasite of the melon fly in Hawaii. J Agr Res 6: 423-438. Weems HY. 1964. Melon fly (Dacus cucurbitae Coquillett) (Diptera: Tephritidae). Entomology Circular 29: 1-2. Weems HV Jr, Heppner JB and Fasulo TR. 2001. Melon fly, Bactrocera cucurbitae Coquillett (Insecta: Diptera: Tephritidae). University of Florida Publication EENY- 199. Wen HC. 1985. Field studies on Melon Fly (Dacus cucurbitae) and attratant experiment in southern Taiwan. Jour Agric Res China 34: 228-235. Wong TTY, Cunningham RT, Mcinnis DO and Gilmore JE. 1989. Seasonal distribution and abundance of Dacus cucurbitae (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Rota, Commonwealth of the Mariana Islands. Entomological Society of America 18: 1079-1082. Yau C. 2012. The most poisonous plant on earth castor-oil plant. Flora Delight 10: 24-26.
Melon fly, Bactrocera cucurtbitae (Coquillett), is one of the most economically important pests of Cucurbitaceae throughout the whole island of Taiwan. This study investigated and evaluated the roosting behavior of melon fly as field surveying and control techniques. When castor bean (Ricinus communis L.) leaves and leaf-mimicking papers coexisted in the net cages, female melon fly didn't show preference for any one, but male melon fly preferred to roost on the leaf-mimicking papers. Thus, we use leaf-mimicking papers to evaluate the roosting behavior of mated and unmated melon fly. In roost site selection test, the first result showed that mated male melon fly and unmated female melon fly preferred to roost on leaf-mimicking sticky papers of 180 cm above the ground, mean roosting percentages were 48.82 and 36.53%, respectively. The second result showed that mated male melon fly and unmated melon fly preferred to roost on the abaxial surface, mean roosting percentages were 72.62、53.04 and 64.51%, respectively. In color selection test, the result showed that the roosting rates of mated female melon fly were not significantly different among sticky papers with dark green, light green and yellow colors. However, mated male melon fly and unmated melon fly preferred to roost on light green leaf-mimicking papers, mean roosting percentages were 43.09, 34.56 and 37.41%, respectively. In shape selection test, melon fly preferred for leaf-mimicking shape. The primary field test conducted to evaluate the feasibility of placement method of sticky paper in field. The results showed that leaf-mimicking sticky paper with horizontal placement was a potential method to survey and manage melon fly, and it will reduce interferences to non-target organisms.

瓜實蠅 (Bactrocera cucurbitae)為臺灣葫蘆科作物的重要經濟害蟲,本研究探討與評估應用瓜實蠅停棲行為的偏好習性做為田間監測與防治之技術。當蓖麻 (Ricinus communis L.) 葉片與模擬葉片同時存在時,瓜實蠅雌蠅停棲於 2 種葉片間的數量無顯著差異,但雄蠅停棲於模擬葉片的數量則顯著多於蓖麻葉。以模擬之蓖麻葉塗黏蟲膠,進行懸掛高度、葉片位置、葉片顏色、葉片形狀等對瓜實蠅停棲偏好試驗,在不同高度偏好中,已交尾雄蠅及未交尾雌蠅顯著偏好 180 cm 高的位置,停棲比率分別為 48.82 及 36.53%。在停棲於葉片或葉面偏好試驗,已交尾雄蠅及未交尾雌、雄蠅皆偏好停棲於葉背,停棲比率分別為 72.62、53.04 及 64.51%。在顏色偏好試驗,已交尾雌蠅停棲於深綠、淡綠及黃色模擬葉片間無顯著差異,雄蠅則偏好停棲淡綠色,停棲比率占 43.09%;未交尾雌雄蠅皆顯著偏好停棲於淡綠色模擬葉片,停棲比率分別為 34.56 及 37.41%。在形狀偏好試驗,模擬葉片形狀的平板所黏附到的平均數量相較於其他處理較多。田間試驗中,評估水平擺放模擬葉片黏板對瓜實蠅的誘捕效果,結果顯示具黏附瓜果實蠅類的潛力,且相較於慣用的黃色黏板,其黏附的天敵數量較少,田間應用上有利於減少對非標的昆蟲之干擾。
其他識別: U0005-1208201511125700
Rights: 同意授權瀏覽/列印電子全文服務,2016-08-24起公開。
Appears in Collections:昆蟲學系

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat Existing users please Login
nchu-104-7102036006-1.pdf4.39 MBAdobe PDFThis file is only available in the university internal network    Request a copy
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.