Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11455/89256
標題: 民眾對平地森林價值及平地造林獎勵政策之看法─以鰲鼓溼地森林園區遊客為例
Public Attitudes toward Plain Forest Values and Plain Afforestation Award Policy─A Case Study of Visitors in Aogu Wetland and Forest Park
作者: Chiau-Wei Chen
陳巧瑋
關鍵字: 平地造林獎勵政策;平地森林價值;鰲鼓溼地森林園區;民眾;Plain Afforestation Award policy;Plain forest values;Aogu wetland and forest park;Public
引用: 王培蓉、鄭欽龍(2002)台灣民眾對不同森林經營方式的認知與評價之分析,台大實驗林報告16(2):135-144。 王培蓉、李俊志、黃秋蓮(2010)造林獎勵金對農民有效嗎?-簡述99年林務局綠色造林計畫巡迴說明會調查成果,林業研究專訊17(6):37-41。 王秦雪(2009)環境汙染區民眾參與之行為意向變遷—中石化安順廠址汙染個案分析,東海大學行政管理暨政策學研究所碩士論文,共202頁。 王靜、沈月琴、朱臻、陳炎根、鮑澤欽、后必成(2010)公眾對森林碳匯服務的認知與支付意願分析,浙江林學院學報27(6):910-915。 任憶安(1992)國人對森林認知程度之研究,林業試驗所研究報告季刊7(2):121-129。 任憶安、林俊成(1997)台灣私有林造林獎勵方式效果的評估-林農反應調查報告,台灣林業科學12(4):393-402。 任憶安、塗三賢、吳萬益(1998)台灣私有林農對現行修訂之造林獎勵反應的初步調查,台灣林業科學13(2):139-146。 任億安(2000)台灣私有林造林獎勵方式有效嗎,林業研究專訊38:3-4。 汪大雄、鐘旭和、林俊秀(1994)苗栗縣公私有林經營現況之調查分析,林業試驗所研究報告季刊9(2):143-160。 行政院農委會(2010)平地景觀造林計畫,農業施政計畫專案查證報告,99農管-1.2-企-01。 余致力(2006)全球化與民主化變遷中的新世紀森林治理,林務局委託研究計畫。 余致力(2000)民意與公共政策:表達方式的釐清與因果關係的研究,中國行政評論9(4):81-110。 吳明隆、涂金堂(2005)SPSS與統計應用分析,五南圖書出版公司,共965頁。 吳定(2006)公共政策辭典,五南圖書公司,464頁。 李久先、顏添明(2001)全民造林運動造林樹種之經濟價值探討,林業研究季刊23(2):35-46。 李久先、顏添明、許哲維(2007)私有林主對於造林獎勵政策認知及政策態度之探討—以台中縣為例,林業研究季刊29(4):43-54。 李依陵、黃建中、何幸霖(2010)林務局所藏日治與戰後林業檔案簡介,臺灣史研究17(2):213-241。 林俊成、鄭美如、劉淑芬、李國忠(2002)全民造林運動二氧化碳吸存潛力之經濟效益評估,臺灣林業科學17(3):312-321。 林俊成、王培蓉、陳麗琴、林裕仁(2008)環境態度類型對森林生態系服務重要性認知之研究,台灣林業科學23:51-62。 林俊成、王培蓉、柳婉郁(2010a)臺灣獎勵造林政策之實施及其成效,林業研究專訊17(2):16-21。 林俊成、李俊志、王培蓉、陳麗琴、柳婉郁(2010b)私有林主對全球暖化議題認知與造林減碳意願之分析,農林學報59(2):105-121。 林國慶(2003)平地造林政策之分析,農業經濟叢刊8(2):111-140。 林國慶(2006)台糖平地景觀造林效益之評估,行政院農業委員會林務局委託研究計畫期中報告,95-00-5-13。 林國慶、柳婉郁(2007a)全民造林政策之執行成果與政策分析,農業與經濟38:31-65。 林國慶、柳婉郁(2007b)平地景觀造林政策之執行成果與實證分析,法制論叢40:175-211。 林國慶、柳婉郁、陳昱安(2009)全民造林停止後山坡地造林政策之分析,中華林學季刊42(4):577-594。 林務局網站(1995;2009;2011;2013) http://www.forest.gov.tw/ 姚鶴年(1994)台灣林業之發展,中華林學會。 張春興(1992)現代心理學,東華書局,791頁。 陳連勝(1999)全民造林運動經濟可行性之研究,林業研究季刊21(1):93-112。 陳阿興、陳麗美(2002)推動平地景觀造林?讓我們一起打造綠色新家園,臺灣林業28(1):18-21。 陳順宇(2005)多變量分析,華泰文化,710頁。 陳莉坪(2008)台糖平地造林植林碳匯計畫設計文件之研究,國立台灣大學生物資源系暨農學院森林環境暨資源學系碩士論文,116頁。 焦國模(2005)林業政策與林業行政,洪葉文化有限公司,471頁。 黃裕星(2009)社區林業實務推展與研究方向,林業研究專訊16(4):1-4。 黃裕星(2010)臺灣綠色造林計畫之展望,林業研究專訊17(6):1-4。 黃裕星(2012)對臺灣林業新政的期許,林業研究專訊19(1):1-8。 黃財尉(2003)共同因素分析與主成份分析之比較,彰化師大輔導學報 25: 63-86 頁 。 臺灣山林悠遊網(2014) http://recreation.forest.gov.tw/ 廖學誠、鐘龍治、陳宛君(2005)羅東林區民眾對林業經營的認知與態度,「2005年社區保育學術研討會論文集」127-152。 蔡志堅(2006)長三角地區公眾森林環境服務付費意識的調查,林業經濟問題26(6):505-509。 潘德發、黃信富、羅尤娟(2010)平地森林園區設置規劃與推動概述,林業研究專訊17(6):31-36。 顏添明、李久先、楊志義(2002)造林獎勵政策相關問題之探討,林業研究季刊24(2):1-12。 顏添明、李久先、許惠瑜、劉兆昌(2004)推廣人員對於平地景觀造林計畫相關問題看法之探討,林業研究季刊26(2):33-42。 顏添明(2006)森林經營學,中興大學森林經營暨林政學研究室,153頁。 顏添明、李久先、許哲維(2008)私有林主之參與經驗與造林獎勵政策關係之探討—以台中縣為例,林業研究季刊30(3):53-64。 羅凱安(2011)臺灣小規模民營森林經營面臨的問題與未來發展策略,林業研究專訊 18(2):9-18。 顧蕾、吳偉光、沈月琴、姜春前(2007)生態公益林建設對森林可持續經營的影響,南京林業大學學報31(1):10-14。 Allen S. D., D. A. Wickwar, F. P. Clark, R. R. Dow, R. Potts and S. A. Snyder (2009) Values, beliefs and attitudes technical guide for forest service land and resource management, planning and decisionmaking, Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-788. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 112 pp. Ananda J. and G. Herath (2003) The use of Analytic Hierarchy Process to incorporate stakeholder preferences into regional forest planning, Forest Policy and Economics 5: 13–26. Berenson M. L., D. M. Levine and T. C. Krehbiel (2012) Basic Business Statistics: Concept and Applications. 12th ed., Global Edition. Brown G. and P. Reed (2000) Validation of a forest values typology for use in national forest planning, Forest Science 46(2) : 240-247. Fishbein M. and I. Ajzen (1975) Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA. Kaiser H. F. (1974) An index of factorial simplicity, Psychometrika, 39 : 31-36. Kangas J. and P. Niemel?inen (1996) Opinion of forest owners and the public on forests and their use in Finland, Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 11:1-4, 269-280. Kangas A., N. Saarinen, H. Saarikoski, L.A. Leskinen and T. Hujala, J. Tikkanen (2010) Stakeholder perspectives about proper participation for Regional Forest Programmes in Finland, Forest Policy and Economics, 12 : 213–222. Kenli A. S., A. L. Ross-Davis and S. R. Broussard (2006) Exploring the dimensionality and social bases of the public's timber harvesting attitudes, Landscape and Urban Planning 78 : 135–146. Kozak R. A., W. C. Spetic, H. W. Harshaw, T. C. Maness and S. R. J. Sheppard (2008) Public priorities for sustainable forest management in six forest dependent communities of British Columbia, Canadian Journal Forest of Research 38: 3071–3084. Kunter M. H., C. J. Nachtsheim, J. Neter and W. Li (2005) Applied Linear Statistical Models. 15th ed., McGRAW-Hill Edition. Lin J. C., K. C. Lee, L. C. Lin and Y. J. Lin (2007) Application of a paired-comparison method to evaluate forest public service values, Taiwan Journal of Forest Science 22(1) : 69-80. Lin J. C., C. S. Wu, W. Y. Liu and C. C. Lee (2011) Behavioral intentions toward afforestation and carbon reduction by the Taiwanese public. Forest Policy and Economics 14(1) : 119-126. Liu W. Y. and Lin J. C. (2011) Landlord awareness of and willingness to participate in a green forestation plan: the case of Tainan County. Taiwan Jouenal of Forest Science 26(2) : 113-24. McFarlane B. L. and P. C. Boxall (2000) Factors Influencing Forest Values and Attitudes of Two Stakeholder Groups : The Case of the Foothills Model Forest, Alberta, Canada, Society and Natural Resources, 13 : 649-661. McFarlane B. L., T. M. Beckley, E. Huddart-Kennedy, S. Nadeau and S. Wyatt (2011) Public views on forest management: value orientation and forest dependency as indicators of diversity, Canadian Journal of Forest Research 41 : 740–749. Mohai P. (1992) Men, women and the environment: An examination of the gender gap in environmental concern and activism, Society and Natural Resources: An International Journal, 5(1) : 1-19. Ogunjinmi A. A., S. A. Onadeko and A. A. Adewumi (2012) An Empirical Study of the Effects of Personal Factors on Environmental Attitudes of Local Communities around Nigeria's Protected Areas, The Journal of Transdisciplinary Environmental Studies 11(1) : 40-53. O'Leary T. N., A. G. McCormack and J. P. Clinch (2000) Afforestation in Ireland regional differences in attitude, Land Use Policy 17 : 39-48. O'Neil J. (1992) The varieties of intrinsic value, Monist 75(2) : 119-137.引用自Winter (2005) Steel B. S., P. List and B. Shindler (1994) Conflicting values about federal forests: A comparison of national and Oregon publics. Society and Natural Resources: An International Journal 7(2) : 137-153. Tarrant M. and H. K. Cordell (2002) Amenity Values of Public and Private Forests: Examining the Value–Attitude Relationship, Environmental Management, 30(5) : 692–703. Winter C. (2005) Preferences and Values for Forests and Wetlands: A Comparison of Farmers, Environmentalists, and the General Public in Australia, Society and Natural Resources: An International Journal, 18(6) : 541-555.
摘要: 
本研究目的在於探討民眾對平地森林價值及造林區位的傾向與平地獎勵造林政策之態度,以鰲鼓溼地森林園區為例,藉由問卷調查民眾對平地森林和平地造林獎勵政策的看法,並進一步探討影響平地造林獎勵政策及平地森林價值的相關變項。所得結果顯示,受訪者較注重森林價值之社會及環境層面;也普遍認同平地造林獎勵政策的內容及目標,特別是「植林減碳」與「維護生物多樣性」的政策目標。造林區位則傾向於荒廢及需要復育之農業區,而較不偏好在一般及特定農業區栽植森林,亦即一般及特定農業區應考慮農業生產。此外,政策內容的認同度會受到平地森林價值的社會及經濟層面影響;不同政策目標之認同度,則依民眾所持有的平地森林價值傾向不同而有所影響。在背景屬性方面發現,年齡、月收入與婚姻變項會影響平地森林價值傾向及平地造林獎勵政策之看法,分別為年長者、高收入者及已婚者較重視平地森林價值之社會與環境層面,且較認同平地造林獎勵政策。除了上述三個變項外,性別變項亦會影響民眾對政策目標之態度,研究結果顯示,男性、年長者、高收入者及已婚者會較認同某些政策目標。本研究以鰲鼓溼地森林園區為研究範疇,探討民眾對平地森林價值傾向、平地造林政策與造林區位態度之現況,所得之結果將可提供政府將來在規劃相關政策之參考。

The purpose of this study was to assess the public attitudes toward plain forest values and Plain Afforestation Award policy. The study area was located in Ao-gu wetland forest park. The questionnaires were designed and used on-site surveys to survey visitors. The results showed that the visitors tend to pay attention to the social and environment dimensions of plain forest values, and they also approve of the policy content and targets, especially in'carbon reduction'and'maintenance of biodiversity'. As for the afforestation areas, they preferred the agricultural region which was abandoned in current status and needed restoration. Whereas, the general and specific agricultural areas showed lower scores in this study, suggesting that argricultural production should be taken into consideration in these areas. Moreover, the agreement of policy content is influenced by the social and environmental dimensions of plain forest values. As for socio-demographic variables, this study found that age, monthly income and marriage influence the tendency to plain forest values and the opinion of Plain Forestry Award policy. It showed that the elders, high-income earns and married people concern about the social and environmental dimensions of plain forest values; and they also agree with the Plain Afforestation Award policy. In addition to these 3 socio-demographic variables as mentioned above, gender also affects the public attitude toward the policy targets. In general, that the male, elders, high-income earns and married people might approve of some policy targets. This study focuses on the public in Ao-gu wetland forest park, whose attitude toward plain forest values, afforestation area and Plain Forestry Award policy in the present status in order to provide the government information for afforestation policy implementation.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11455/89256
Rights: 同意授權瀏覽/列印電子全文服務,2014-08-31起公開。
Appears in Collections:森林學系

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat Existing users please Login
nchu-103-7101033019-1.pdf6.75 MBAdobe PDFThis file is only available in the university internal network    Request a copy
Show full item record
 

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.