Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11455/92457
標題: Assessing innovation capability of industry through patented technologies- case for Taiwan
專利技術衡量產業之創新能力-以台灣為例
作者: 康晴雯
Ching-Wen Kang
關鍵字: 專利;知識流動;臺灣;跨產業;patent;knowledge flow;Taiwan;cross-industry
引用: Harrington, J. L. (2010). 3 - Introduction to SQL. In J. L. Harrington (Ed.), SQL Clearly Explained (Third Edition) (pp. 65–74). Boston: Morgan Kaufmann. Skarzynski, P., & Gibson, R. (2013). Innovation to the Core: A Blueprint for Transforming the Way Your Company Innovates. Harvard Business Press. Acs, Z. J., Anselin, L., & Varga, A. (2002). Patents and innovation counts as measures of regional production of new knowledge. Research Policy, 31(7), 1069–1085. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00184-6 Adams, S. (2008). Globalization and income inequality: Implications for intellectual property rights. Journal of Policy Modeling, 30(5), 725–735. doi:10.1016/j.jpolmod.2007.10.005 Allred, B. B., & Park, W. G. (2007). The influence of patent protection on firm innovation investment in manufacturing industries. Journal of International Management, 13(2), 91–109. doi:10.1016/j.intman.2007.02.001 Bergek, A., & Bruzelius, M. (2010). Are patents with multiple inventors from different countries a good indicator of international R&D collaboration? The case of ABB. Research Policy, 39(10), 1321–1334. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2010.08.002 Bermudez-Edo, M., Noguera, M., Hurtado-Torres, N., Hurtado, M. V., & Garrido, J. L. (2013). Analyzing a firm's international portfolio of technological knowledge: A declarative ontology-based OWL approach for patent documents. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 27(3), 358–365. doi:10.1016/j.aei.2013.02.003 Besen, S. M. (1986). Private copying, reproduction costs, and the supply of intellectual property. Information Economics and Policy, 2(1), 5–22. doi:10.1016/0167-6245(86)90012-0 Bessen, J. (2008). The value of U.S. patents by owner and patent characteristics. Research Policy, 37(5), 932–945. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2008.02.005 Blind, K., Cremers, K., & Mueller, E. (2009). The influence of strategic patenting on companies' patent portfolios. Research Policy, 38(2), 428–436. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2008.12.003 Brunswicker, S., & Hutschek, U. (2010). CROSSING HORIZONS: LEVERAGING CROSS-INDUSTRY INNOVATION SEARCH IN THE FRONT-END OF THE INNOVATION PROCESS. International Journal of Innovation Management, 14(04), 683–702. doi:10.1142/S1363919610002829 Burke, P. F., & Reitzig, M. (2007). Measuring patent assessment quality—Analyzing the degree and kind of (in)consistency in patent offices' decision making. Research Policy, 36(9), 1404–1430. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2007.06.003 Chang, P.-L., & Shih, H.-Y. (2004). The innovation systems of Taiwan and China: a comparative analysis. Technovation, 24(7), 529–539. doi:10.1016/S0166-4972(02)00117-7 Chen, Y., Yang, Z., Shu, F., Hu, Z., Meyer, M., & Bhattacharya, S. (2009). A patent based evaluation of technological innovation capability in eight economic regions in PR China. World Patent Information, 31(2), 104–110. doi:10.1016/j.wpi.2008.06.010 Choung, J.-Y. (1998). Patterns of innovation in Korea and Taiwan. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 45(4), 357 –365. doi:10.1109/17.728577 Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1). Cook, J. P. (2007). On understanding the increase in us patent litigation. American Law and Economics Review, 9(1), 48–71. Cysne, R. P., & Turchick, D. (2012). Intellectual property rights protection and endogenous economic growth revisited. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 36(6), 851–861. doi:10.1016/j.jedc.2011.12.005 De Rassenfosse, G., Dernis, H., Guellec, D., Picci, L., & van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, B. (2013). The worldwide count of priority patents: A new indicator of inventive activity. Research Policy, 42(3), 720–737. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2012.11.002 Dobkins, L. H. (1996). Location, innovation and trade: The role of localization and nation-based externalities. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 26(6), 591–612. doi:10.1016/S0166-0462(96)02138-2 Dubarić, E., Giannoccaro, D., Bengtsson, R., & Ackermann, T. (2011). Patent data as indicators of wind power technology development. World Patent Information, 33(2), 144–149. doi:10.1016/j.wpi.2010.12.005 Edvinsson, L., & Sullivan, P. (1996). Developing a model for managing intellectual capital. European Management Journal, 14(4), 356–364. Enkel, E., & Gassmann, O. (2010). Creative imitation: exploring the case of cross-industry innovation. R&D Management, 40(3), 256–270. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9310.2010.00591.x Enkel, E., & Heil, S. (2014). Preparing for distant collaboration: Antecedents to potential absorptive capacity in cross-industry innovation. Technovation, 34(4), 242–260. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2014.01.010 Ernst, H. (2003). Patent information for strategic technology management. World Patent Information, 25(3), 233–242. doi:10.1016/S0172-2190(03)00077-2 Ernst, H., & Omland, N. (2011). The Patent Asset Index – A new approach to benchmark patent portfolios. World Patent Information, 33(1), 34–41. doi:10.1016/j.wpi.2010.08.008 Etzkowitz, H. (2003). Innovation in Innovation: The Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations. Social Science Information, 42(3), 293–337. doi:10.1177/05390184030423002 Fai, F. M. (2005). Using intellectual property data to analyse China's growing technological capabilities. World Patent Information, 27(1), 49–61. doi:10.1016/j.wpi.2004.08.004 Gaff, B. M., Murphy, B. P., & Cuomo, P. J. (2012). Defending Against Patent Infringement. Computer, 45(4), 9–12. Gassmann, O., Daiber, M., & Enkel, E. (2011). The role of intermediaries in cross-industry innovation processes. R&D Management, 41(5), 457–469. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9310.2011.00651.x Gassmann, O., Zeschky, M., Wolff, T., & Stahl, M. (2010). Crossing the Industry-Line: Breakthrough Innovation through Cross-Industry Alliances with 'Non-Suppliers.' Long Range Planning, 43(5–6), 639–654. doi:10.1016/j.lrp.2010.06.003 Gould, D. M., & Gruben, W. C. (1996). The role of intellectual property rights in economic growth. Journal of Development Economics, 48(2), 323–350. doi:10.1016/0304-3878(95)00039-9 Hanel, P. (2006). Intellectual property rights business management practices: A survey of the literature. Technovation, 26(8), 895–931. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2005.12.001 Herstad, S. J., Aslesen, H. W., & Ebersberger, B. (2014). On industrial knowledge bases, commercial opportunities and global innovation network linkages. Research Policy, 43(3), 495–504. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2013.08.003 Hsu, D. W. L., & Yuan, B. J. C. (2013). Knowledge creation and diffusion of Taiwan's universities: Knowledge trajectory from patent data. Technology in Society, 35(3), 172–181. doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2013.05.002 Hu, M.-C. (2008). Knowledge flows and innovation capability: The patenting trajectory of Taiwan's thin film transistor-liquid crystal display industry. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 75(9), 1423–1438. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2008.04.005 Hu, M.-C. (2012). Technological innovation capabilities in the thin film transistor-liquid crystal display industries of Japan, Korea, and Taiwan. Research Policy, 41(3), 541–555. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2011.10.013 Hu, M.-C., & Tseng, C.-Y. (2007). Technological interdependence and knowledge diffusion in the building of national innovative capacity: The role of Taiwan's chemical industry. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 74(3), 298–312. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2006.04.001 Jaffe, A. B. (2000). The US patent system in transition: policy innovation and the innovation process. Research Policy, 29(4-5), 531–557. Jalles, J. T. (2010). How to measure innovation? New evidence of the technology–growth linkage. Research in Economics, 64(2), 81–96. doi:10.1016/j.rie.2009.10.007 Kanwar, S., & Evenson, R. (2009). On the strength of intellectual property protection that nations provide. Journal of Development Economics, 90(1), 50–56. doi:10.1016/j.jdeveco.2008.11.006 Kazenske, E. R. (2003). The future of prior art searching at the United States patent and trademark office. World Patent Information, 25(4), 283–287. doi:10.1016/j.wpi.2003.07.001 Kerr, A., & Riain, S. O. S. O. (2009). Knowledge Economy. In R. Kitchin & N. Thrift (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of Human Geography (pp. 31–36). Oxford: Elsevier. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780080449104001917 Kingston, W. (2001a). Innovation needs patents reform. Research Policy, 30(3), 403–423. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00090-1 Kingston, W. (2001b). Innovation needs patents reform. Research Policy, 30(3), 403–423. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00090-1 Lai, H.-C., & Shyu, J. Z. (2005). A comparison of innovation capacity at science parks across the Taiwan Strait: the case of Zhangjiang High-Tech Park and Hsinchu Science-based Industrial Park. Technovation, 25(7), 805–813. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2003.11.004 Lanjouw, J. O., & Schankerman, M. (2004). Patent Quality and Research Productivity: Measuring Innovation with Multiple Indicators*. The Economic Journal, 114(495), 441–465. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0297.2004.00216.x Lemper, T. A. (2012a). The critical role of timing in managing intellectual property. Business Horizons, 55(4), 339–347. doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2012.03.002 Lemper, T. A. (2012b). The critical role of timing in managing intellectual property. Business Horizons, 55(4), 339–347. doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2012.03.002 Li, Y., & Vanhaverbeke, W. (2009). The effects of inter-industry and country difference in supplier relationships on pioneering innovations. Technovation, 29(12), 843–858. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2009.08.001 Lin, C. Y.-Y., & Chen, M. Y.-C. (2007). Does innovation lead to performance? An empirical study of SMEs in Taiwan. Management Research News, 30(2), 115–132. doi:10.1108/01409170710722955 Llobet, G. (2003). Patent litigation when innovation is cumulative. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 21(8), 1135–1157. doi:10.1016/S0167-7187(03)00057-2 Love, J. H., Roper, S., & Vahter, P. (2014). Dynamic complementarities in innovation strategies. Research Policy. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2014.05.005 Mahmood, I. P., & Singh, J. (2003). Technological dynamism in Asia. Research Policy, 32(6), 1031–1054. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00109-9 Mathews, J. A. (2002). The origins and dynamics of Taiwan's R&D consortia. Research Policy, 31(4), 633–651. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00131-7 Messeni Petruzzelli, A., Rotolo, D., & Albino, V. (n.d.). Determinants of patent citations in biotechnology: An analysis of patent influence across the industrial and organizational boundaries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2014.02.018 Nagaoka, S., Motohashi, K., & Goto, A. (2010). Chapter 25 - Patent Statistics as an Innovation Indicator. In Bronwyn H. Hall and Nathan Rosenberg (Ed.), Handbook of the Economics of Innovation (Vol. Volume 2, pp. 1083–1127). North-Holland. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169721810020095 Narin, F., Noma, E., & Perry, R. (1987). Patents as indicators of corporate technological strength. Research Policy, 16(2–4), 143–155. doi:10.1016/0048-7333(87)90028-X Nelson, A. J. (2009). Measuring knowledge spillovers: What patents, licenses and publications reveal about innovation diffusion. Research Policy, 38(6), 994–1005. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2009.01.023 Oxley, J. E. (1999). Institutional environment and the mechanisms of governance: the impact of intellectual property protection on the structure of inter-firm alliances. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 38(3), 283–309. doi:10.1016/S0167-2681(99)00011-6 Park, W. G., & Ginarte, J. C. (1997). Intellectual Property Rights and Economic Growth. Contemporary Economic Policy, 15(3), 51–61. doi:10.1111/j.1465-7287.1997.tb00477.x Qian, Y. (2007). Do National Patent Laws Stimulate Domestic Innovation in a Global Patenting Environment? A Cross-Country Analysis of Pharmaceutical Patent Protection, 1978–2002. Review of Economics and Statistics, 89(3), 436–453. doi:10.1162/rest.89.3.436 Reitzig, M. (2004). Improving patent valuations for management purposes—validating new indicators by analyzing application rationales. Research Policy, 33(6–7), 939–957. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2004.02.004 Sandner, P. G., & Block, J. (2011). The market value of R&D, patents, and trademarks. Research Policy, 40(7), 969–985. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2011.04.004 Sherry, E. F., & Teece, D. J. (2004). Royalties, evolving patent rights, and the value of innovation. Research Policy, 33(2), 179–191. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(03)00088-X Shih, H.-Y., & Chang, P.-L. (2009). Industrial innovation networks in Taiwan and China: A comparative analysis. Technology in Society, 31(2), 176–186. doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2009.03.007 Shyu, J. Z., & Chiu, Y. (2002). Innovation policy for developing Taiwan's competitive advantages. R&D Management, 32(4), 369–374. doi:10.1111/1467-9310.00267 Sirilli, G., & Evangelista, R. (1998). Technological innovation in services and manufacturing: results from Italian surveys. Research Policy, 27(9), 881–899. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00084-5 Smarzynska Javorcik, B. (2004). The composition of foreign direct investment and protection of intellectual property rights: Evidence from transition economies. European Economic Review, 48(1), 39–62. doi:10.1016/S0014-2921(02)00257-X Sternitzke, C. (2010a). Knowledge sources, patent protection, and commercialization of pharmaceutical innovations. Research Policy, 39(6), 810–821. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2010.03.001 Sternitzke, C. (2010b). Knowledge sources, patent protection, and commercialization of pharmaceutical innovations. Research Policy, 39(6), 810–821. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2010.03.001 Su, H.-N., Chen, C. M.-L., & Lee, P.-C. (2012a). Patent litigation precaution method: analyzing characteristics of US litigated and non-litigated patents from 1976 to 2010. Scientometrics, 92(1), 181–195. doi:10.1007/s11192-012-0716-7 Su, H.-N., Chen, C. M.-L., & Lee, P.-C. (2012b). Patent litigation precaution method: analyzing characteristics of US litigated and non-litigated patents from 1976 to 2010. Scientometrics, 92(1), 181–195. doi:10.1007/s11192-012-0716-7 Suzuki, J. (2011). Structural modeling of the value of patent. Research Policy, 40(7), 986–1000. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2011.05.006 Talke, K., Salomo, S., & Rost, K. (2010). How top management team diversity affects innovativeness and performance via the strategic choice to focus on innovation fields. Research Policy, 39(7), 907–918. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2010.04.001 Utterback, J. M., & Suarez, F. F. (1993). Innovation, competition, and industry structure. Research Policy, 22(1), 1–21. doi:10.1016/0048-7333(93)90030-L Watanabe, C., Tsuji, Y. S., & Griffy-Brown, C. (2001). Patent statistics: deciphering a 'real' versus a 'pseudo' proxy of innovation. Technovation, 21(12), 783–790. doi:10.1016/S0166-4972(01)00025-6 West, J., Salter, A., Vanhaverbeke, W., & Chesbrough, H. (2014). Open innovation: The next decade. Research Policy, 43(5), 805–811. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2014.03.001 Wissema, J. G., & Euser, L. (1991). Successful innovation through inter-company networks. Long Range Planning, 24(6), 33–39. doi:10.1016/0024-6301(91)90041-L Wright, C., Sturdy, A., & Wylie, N. (2012). Management innovation through standardization: Consultants as standardizers of organizational practice. Research Policy, 41(3), 652–662. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2011.12.004 Academia Sinica. (2014). Retrieved April 20, 2014, from http://www.sinica.edu.tw/main_e.shtml Chung-Shan Institute of Science and Technology Dual-use Technology Service Park. (2014). Retrieved April 19, 2014, from http://www.csistdup.org.tw/eng/index.asp Council of Agriculture, Executive Yuan, R.O.C.(Taiwan). (2014). Retrieved April 19, 2014, from http://eng.coa.gov.tw/index.php FIRDI. (2014). Retrieved April 21, 2014, from http://www.firdi.org.tw/EngWeb/EngHPg.htm National Applied Research Laboratories. (2014). Retrieved April 19, 2014, from http://www.narlabs.org.tw/en/ III - Institute for Information Industry. (2014). Retrieved April 21, 2014, from http://web.iii.org.tw/ Industrial Technology Research Institute. (2014). Retrieved April 18, 2014, from https://www.itri.org.tw/eng/index.aspx Institute of Nuclear Energy Research (INER). (2014). Retrieved April 19, 2014, from http://www.iner.gov.tw/siteiner/wSite/mp?mp=INER_E IOSH. (2014). Retrieved April 19, 2014, from http://www.iosh.gov.tw/English/Publish.aspx?cnid=95&P=34 Metal Industries Research Development Centre. (2014). Retrieved April 19, 2014, from http://www.mirdc.org.tw/english/index.aspx News and Events - Taiwan Textile Research Institu. (2014). Retrieved April 21, 2014, from http://www.ttri.org.tw/econtent/news/news04.aspx TTLA - Taiwan TFT LCD Association. (2014). Retrieved April 22, 2014, from http://www.ttla.org.tw/en/about National Health Research Institutes. (2014). Retrieved April 21, 2014, from http://english.nhri.org.tw/NHRI_WEB/nhriw001Action.do Development Center for Biotechnology. (2014). Retrieved April 21, 2014, from http://www.dcb.org.tw/dcben.aspx Nair, S. S., Mathew, M., & Nag, D. (2014). Effect of firm variables on patent price. Retrieved May 6, 2014, from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0970389611001261 OECD. (1997). Patents and Innovation in the International Context. OECD. (2004). Patents and Innovation: Trends and Policy Challenges. Smith, N. R. (1967). The Entrepreneur a2014/7/6 9:19 PMnd His Firm: The Relationship between Type of Man and Type of Company (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. ID 1510005). Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=1510005
摘要: 
Due to the constantly changing nature of modern society, it is of critical importance for decision makers to understand science–technology linkages as well as innovation study based on patented technologies. Patent and innovation are of decisive importance for different levels of innovation studies. A recent surge of research on patent has given us new opportunities and challenges; and there are many advances that have been made in the area of patent analysis. Therefore, this study aims to measure innovation capability and science-technology linkage by analyzing USPTO patents from 1976 to 2012. This research uses properly selected patent indicators such as patent counts and patent citation to measure innovation capability, the findings obtained in this research are summarized as: 1) intensity of knowledge diffusion and knowledge flows across industries can be evaluated through patent citation analysis, electrical engineering industry has been highly cited by other industries, significant citation within the same industries can be observed; 2) Taiwan and global patenting activities can be compared, it is found that Taiwan has relatively high number of patented technologies; 3) the result of citation analysis on Taiwan's patent shows that Taiwan's company and Taiwan's electrical engineering industry received the highest number of citations. In summary, this study provides overall pictures of global and Taiwan's innovation capabilities in order to allow understanding the innovation trends for advancing Taiwan's patenting strategy.

由於社會環境之快速變遷,政策制定者如何透過理了解科學技術與知識之連結以作出有效決策,為越來越顯重要之客題。專利與創新對各種不同層級之組織而言,往往具有不同面向之重要性。本研究旨在藉由分析美國專利商標局自1976至2012年所核准之utility專利,以衡量創新能力與科學技術之連結性。本研究中選用合適之指標來衡量創新能耐,例如專利數量、專利引證數、訴訟專利。本研究發現:1)以專利引證分析知識擴散與跨產業知識流動,其結果顯示電子工程產業之專利被引證次數最多,且各產業之知識流動行為均頃向同產業內之自我引證,2)比較臺灣專利與全球專利產出,台灣具有極為顯著之專利活動,3)分析臺灣各種專利所有權人之專利產出,發現專利所有權人為公司之專利,比其他類型專利所有權人具有較高之被引證次數;電子工程產業之專利比其他產業別之專利具有較高被引證次數。透過本研究,得以了解台灣於全球專利相關創新活動之定位,以提升台灣未來專利佈局之策略。
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11455/92457
其他識別: U0005-0807201402283000
Rights: 同意授權瀏覽/列印電子全文服務,2017-07-11起公開。
Appears in Collections:科技管理研究所

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat Existing users please Login
nchu-103-7101026017-1.pdf9.27 MBAdobe PDFThis file is only available in the university internal network   
Show full item record
 

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.