Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11455/92544
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorWen-Hsien Huangen_US
dc.contributor黃文仙zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorYu-Tzu Paien_US
dc.contributor.author白郁慈zh_TW
dc.contributor.other行銷學系所zh_TW
dc.date2015zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-16T03:23:35Z-
dc.identifier.citationAlford, B. L., & Biswas, A. (2002). The effects of discount level, price consciousness and sale proneness on consumers' price perception and behavioral intention. Journal of Business Research, 55(9), 775-783. Becerril-Arreola, R., Leng, M., & Parlar, M. (2013). Online retailers' promotional pricing, free-shipping threshold, and inventory decisions: A simulation-based analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 230(2), 272-283. Boone, T., & Ganeshan, R. (2013). Exploratory analysis of free shipping policies of online retailers. International Journal of Production Economics, 143(2), 627-632. Campbell, L., & Diamond, W. D. (1990). Framing and sales promotions: The characteristics of a'Good Deal'. Journal of consumer marketing, 7(4), 25-31. Chandon, P., Wansink, B., & Laurent, G. (2000). A benefit congruency framework of sales promotion effectiveness. Journal of Marketing, 64(4), 65-81. Chen, S.-F. S., Monroe, K. B., & Lou, Y.-C. (1998). The effects of framing price promotion messages on consumers' perceptions and purchase intentions. Journal of Retailing, 74(3), 353-372. Darke, P. R., & Chung, C. M. (2005). Effects of pricing and promotion on consumer perceptions: it depends on how you frame it. Journal of Retailing, 81(1), 35-47. Della Bitta, A. J., & Monroe, K. B. (1980). A multivariate analysis of the perception of value from retail price advertisements. Advances in consumer research, 8(1), 161-165. Della Bitta, A. J., Monroe, K. B., & McGinnis, J. M. (1981). Consumer perceptions of comparative price advertisements. Journal of Marketing Research, 416-427. Diamond, W. D., & Sanyal, A. (1990). The effect of framing on the choice of supermarket coupons. Advances in consumer research, 17(1), 488-493. Folse, J. A. G., Niedrich, R. W., & Grau, S. L. (2010). Cause-relating marketing: the effects of purchase quantity and firm donation amount on consumer inferences and participation intentions. Journal of Retailing, 86(4), 295-309. Frisch, D. (1993). Reasons for framing effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 54(3), 399-429. Grewal, D., Krishnan, R., Baker, J., & Borin, N. (1998). The effect of store name, brand name and price discounts on consumers' evaluations and purchase intentions. Journal of Retailing, 74(3), 331-352. Grewal, D., Monroe, K. B., & Krishnan, R. (1998). The effects of price-comparison advertising on buyers' perceptions of acquisition value, transaction value, and behavioral intentions. The Journal of Marketing, 46-59. Hamilton, R. W., & Srivastava, J. (2008). When 2+ 2 is not the same as 1+ 3: Variations in price sensitivity across components of partitioned prices. Journal of Marketing Research, 45(4), 450-461. Hardesty, D. M., & Bearden, W. O. (2003). Consumer evaluations of different promotion types and price presentations: the moderating role of promotional benefit level. Journal of Retailing, 79(1), 17-25. Harlam, B. A., Krishna, A., Lehmann, D. R., & Mela, C. (1995). Impact of bundle type, price framing and familiarity on purchase intention for the bundle. Journal of Business Research, 33(1), 57-66. Kahneman, D., & Miller, D. T. (1986). Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives. Psychological review, 93(2), 136-153. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 263-291. Kalwani, M. U., & Yim, C. K. (1992). Consumer price and promotion expectations: an experimental study. Journal of Marketing Research, 90-100. Koukova, N. T., Srivastava, J., & Steul-Fischer, M. (2012). The effect of shipping fee structure on consumers' online evaluations and choice. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(6), 759-770. Krishna, A., Briesch, R., Lehmann, D. R., & Yuan, H. (2002). A meta-analysis of the impact of price presentation on perceived savings. Journal of Retailing, 78(2), 101-118. Leng, M., & Becerril‐Arreola, R. (2010). Joint Pricing and Contingent Free‐Shipping Decisions in B2C Transactions. Production and Operations Management, 19(4), 390-405. Lewis, M. (2006). The effect of shipping fees on customer acquisition, customer retention, and purchase quantities. Journal of Retailing, 82(1), 13-23. Lewis, M., Singh, V., & Fay, S. (2006). An empirical study of the impact of nonlinear shipping and handling fees on purchase incidence and expenditure decisions. Marketing Science, 25(1), 51-64. Manning, K. C., & Sprott, D. E. (2007). Multiple unit price promotions and their effects on quantity purchase intentions. Journal of Retailing, 83(4), 411-421. Monroe, K. B. (1973). Buyers' subjective perceptions of price. Journal of Marketing Research, 70-80. Palazon, M., & Delgado‐Ballester, E. (2009). Effectiveness of price discounts and premium promotions. Psychology & Marketing, 26(12), 1108-1129. Raghubir, P., Inman, J. J., & Grande, H. (2004). The three faces of consumer promotions. California Management Review(46), 23-42. Raju, J. S. (1992). The effect of price promotions on variability in product category sales. Marketing Science, 11(3), 207-220. Sinha, I., & Smith, M. F. (2000). Consumers' perceptions of promotional framing of price. Psychology & Marketing, 17(3), 257-275. Teng, L. (2009). A comparison of two types of price discounts in shifting consumers' attitudes and purchase intentions. Journal of Business Research, 62(1), 14-21. Thaler, R. (1985). Mental accounting and consumer choice. Marketing Science, 4(3), 199-214. Walters, R. G., & Bommer, W. (1996). Measuring the impact of product and promotion-related factors on product category price elasticities. Journal of Business Research, 36(3), 203-216. Yi, Y., & Yoo, J. (2011). The long‐term effects of sales promotions on brand attitude across monetary and non‐monetary promotions. Psychology & Marketing, 28(9), 879-896. Zhou, B., Katehakis, M. N., & Zhao, Y. (2009). Managing stochastic inventory systems with free shipping option. European Journal of Operational Research, 196(1), 186-197.zh_TW
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11455/92544-
dc.description.abstractOnline stores often employ threshold-based free shipping strategy to attract consumers. For example, the famous brand, Tokichoi offers 'Buy NT$399, free shipping' and Orange Bear provides 'Buy NT$800, free shipping'. Threshold-based free shipping method is when customers' purchase quantity reaches or exceeds a minimum quantity required by retailers; consumers will be offered free shipping service. When employing threshold-based free shipping method, retailers will set different threshold levels based on their capability. Some of the stores decide to use high level of threshold-based free shipping strategy because of the shipping cost. They cannot compensate the cost when employing free shipping method or low level of threshold-based free shipping strategy. However, using high level of threshold-based free shipping strategy will reduce consumers' purchase intention. Therefore, this paper attempts to examine how to not reduce consumers' purchase intention under the condition of employing high level of threshold-based free shipping strategy. This research conducts 3 studies to examine how price discount (high and low), promotional framing (buy one, get one free and buy 2, get 50% off) and promotion type (monetary and nonmonetary) influence consumers' purchase intention toward threshold-based free shipping strategy. The results indicate that consumers have higher purchase intention when retailers offer low level of threshold-based free shipping method than high level of threshold-based free shipping method. However, this effect will disappear under certain conditions which means that consumers' purchase intention will have no significant differences toward low and high level of threshold-based free shipping strategy. First condition is providing high product discount. Second is providing buy one, get one free rather than buy 2, get 50% off. The final one is nonmonetary condition. It means that when retailers employ these three promotional strategies, even if they provide high threshold level method, consumers' purchase intention will not reduce. We infer that these three strategies can shift consumers' referent and drive their attention away from shipping fees and thereby influence consumers' purchase intention. Threshold-based free shipping method is an important strategy for online retailers. Nevertheless, previous literatures did not provide suggestions for retailers how to maintain their order incidence when employing high level of threshold-based free shipping strategy. This research provides three moderators that will shift consumers' attention away from shipping fees and influence their purchase intentions when facing threshold-based free shipping strategy. These findings can assist retailers who can only use high level of threshold-based free shipping strategy to maintain the order incidence through providing high product discount, buy one get one free and nonmonetary promotion.en_US
dc.description.abstract實務上,我們可以發現網購商店經常採用滿額免運費方案來吸引消費者,例如:知名服飾品牌東京著衣推出的滿399免運或是OB嚴選提供的滿800免運。滿額免運費方案指的是當消費者單次訂單訂購金額達到廠商設定之門檻時,即可免付運費。而零售商在採用滿額免運費方案時,其訂定的滿額門檻會根據自身需求而有所不同,部分廠商會因為成本問題,而採取高門檻的滿額免運費方案,因為免運費或是低門檻的滿額免運方案不足以彌補其運費成本,但是採用高門檻的滿額免運費方案又可能會降低消費者的購買意願,因此本研究主要在於探討如何在高門檻的滿額免運費方案下,亦能使消費者的購買意願不降低。 本研究透過三個實驗探討當廠商設置滿額免運費策略時,不同高低的免運費門檻搭配產品折扣(高、低)、促銷框架(買一送一、兩件五折)、促銷類型(金錢性促銷、非金錢性促銷),會如何影響消費者對滿額免運費方案的購買意願。研究結果指出,滿額免運費方案以免運費門檻低相較於門檻高,會使消費者有較高的購買意願,但是此效果在幾種情況下會消失,亦即消費者對高低門檻的購買意願無顯著差異,(1) 高產品折扣 (如五折),(2) 買一送一之促銷框架,而非兩件五折 (3)非金錢性促銷 (如贈品),換言之,廠商若採用此三種促銷策略,即使提供高門檻情境,消費者的購買意願亦不會降低。本研究推論可能是因為參考點的移轉以及消費者會以促銷的本質來決定將促銷交易視為獲利亦或是減少損失,使消費者轉移對運費注意力,並因而改變其購買意願。 滿額免運費方案在實務上是相當重要的策略,然而過去卻無文獻提出如何解決廠商在採用高門檻的策略時,亦能維持其訂單發生率,而本篇研究提出3個調節變數會使消費者在面對滿額免運費策略時,轉移其對運費注意力,而改變其購買意願。實務上,本研究幫助僅能使用高門檻滿額免運費方案之廠商,透過使用高產品折扣、買一送一之促銷框架或是若廠商無法長期提供高成本金錢性促銷,本研究發現非金錢性促銷 (如贈品),皆可以使消費者不降低其購買意願,並維持訂單發生率。zh_TW
dc.description.tableofcontents第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的 3 第二章 文獻探討與研究假設 4 第一節 滿額免運費方案 4 第二節 產品折扣 7 第三節 促銷框架 9 第四節 促銷類型 11 第三章 實驗一 13 第一節 研究架構 13 第二節 實驗設計 14 第三節 變數之操作性定義與研究設計 17 第四節 問卷分析之結果 19 第四章 實驗二 24 第一節 研究架構 24 第二節 實驗設計 25 第三節 變數之操作性定義與研究設計 27 第四節 問卷分析之結果 28 第五章 實驗三 32 第一節 研究架構 32 第二節 實驗設計 33 第三節 變數之操作性定義與研究設計 36 第四節 問卷分析之結果 37 第六章 結論 41 第一節 研究結論 41 第二節 學術貢獻 43 第三節 管理意涵 44 第四節 研究限制與研究未來方向 45 參考文獻 46 附錄:實驗一問卷 49 附錄:實驗二問卷 66 附錄:實驗三問卷 83zh_TW
dc.language.isozh_TWzh_TW
dc.rights同意授權瀏覽/列印電子全文服務,2017-07-24起公開。zh_TW
dc.subject滿額免運費方案zh_TW
dc.subject產品折扣zh_TW
dc.subject促銷框架zh_TW
dc.subject促銷類型zh_TW
dc.subjectThreshold-based free shippingen_US
dc.subjectProduct discounten_US
dc.subjectPromotional framingen_US
dc.subjectPromotion typeen_US
dc.title免運門檻、產品折扣、促銷框架與促銷類型對消費者線上購物之影響zh_TW
dc.titleThe Impact of Threshold-based Free Shipping Method, Product Discount, Promotional Framing and Promotion Type on Consumers' Online Purchase Behavioren_US
dc.typeThesis and Dissertationen_US
dc.date.paperformatopenaccess2018-07-24zh_TW
dc.date.openaccess2017-07-24-
item.openairetypeThesis and Dissertation-
item.fulltextwith fulltext-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextrestricted-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.languageiso639-1zh_TW-
Appears in Collections:行銷學系所
Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat Existing users please Login
nchu-104-7102044021-1.pdf2.78 MBAdobe PDFThis file is only available in the university internal network    Request a copy
Show simple item record
 

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.