Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11455/92574
標題: 知識外溢與創新績效之關聯性研究
The Relationship Between Knowledge Spillover and Innovation Performance
作者: Yi-Hsin Wu
吳亦欣
關鍵字: Spillover Knowledge Pool;Innovation Performance;Changes In Firm Knowledge Couplings;Technological Complexity;外溢知識庫;創新績效;企業知識組成改變;技術複雜度
引用: 中文部分 施振榮,2000,影響創新的9種因素,初版一刷,10-55 英文部分 Ahuja, G., and C.M. Lampert. 2001. Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: A longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions. Strategic Management Journal22: 521-543. Anderson, P., and M. L.Tushman. 1990. Technological discountinuities and dominant designs: A cyclical model of technologicalchange. Administrative Science Quarterly 35: 604-633. Anthony, S. D. 2010. The silver lining: an innovation playbook for uncertain times. 34,153-165. Arundel, A. 2001. The relative effectiveness of patents and secrecy for appropriation. Research Policy 30: 611-624. Baptista, R., and P. Swann. 1998. Do firms in clusters innovate more? Research Policy 27: 525-540. Becker, W., and J. Dietz. 2004. R&D cooperation and innovation activities of firms-evidence for the German manufacturing industry. Research Policy 33: 209-223. Bechky, B. A. 2003. Sharing meaning across occupational communities: The transformation of knowledge on a production floor. Organization Science 14: 312-330. Breschi, S., and F. Malerba. 1997. Sectoral systems of innovation. In Edquist, C.(ed.). Systems of Innovation, Pinter: London. Bönte, W. 2003. R&D and productivity: Internal vs external R&D-evidence from West German manufacturing industries. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 12: 343-360. Caloghirou, Y.,I. Kastelli, and A. Tsakanikas. 2004. Internal capabilities and external knowledge sources: complements or substitutes for innovative performance?Technovation 24(1): 29-39. Carbonell, P.,andA.I.Rodrı´guez. 2006. The impact of market characteristics and innovation speed on perceptions of positional advantage and new product performance. International Journal of Research in Marketing 23 (1): 1–12. Chen W. R., and K. D. Miller. 2007. Situational and institutional determinants of firms' R&D search intensity. Strategic Management Journal 28(4): 369-381. Chesbrough, H. 2003. The era of open innovation. Sloan Management Review (Summer): 35-41. Chesnais, F. 1996. Technological agreements, networks and selected issues in economic theory. in Coombs, R., Richards, A., Saviotti, P.P. and Walsh, V (eds). Technological Collaboration. The Dynamics of Cooperation in Industrial Innovation, Edward Elgar: Cheltenham. Christensen, C. M. 2004. The innovator's dilemma: when new technologies cause great firms to fail. Ciborra, C., 1991. Alliances as learning experiences: cooperation, competition and change in high-tech industries. In: Mytelka, L. (Ed.). Strategic Partnerships and the World Economy. Pinter Publishers. Cohen, W. M. and D. A. Levinthal. 1989. Innovation and Learning: The two faces of R&D. The Economic Journal 99: 569-596. Cohen, W. M., and D. A. Levinthal. 1990. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly 35: 128-152. Cooke, P., and K. Morgan. 1998. The creative milieu: a regional perspective on innovation', in Dodgson, M. and Rothwell, R. (Eds.). The Handbook of Industrial Innovation, Edward Elgar: Cheltenham. Cohen, W. M., R. R. Nelson., and J. P. Walsh. 2002. Links and impacts: the influence of public research on industrial R&D. Management Science 48(1): 1-23. Coombs, R. 1996. Core competences and the strategic management of R&D. R&D Management 26: 345-355. Dosi, G. 1988. Sources, procedures, and microeconomic effects of innovation. Journal of Economic Literature 26: 1120-1171. Edquist, C. 1997. Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions, and Organizations. Pinter: London Fleming, L. 2001. Recombinant uncertainty in technological search. Management Science 47: 117-132. Fleming, L., and O. Sorenson. 2001. Technology as a complex adaptive system: Evidence from patent data. Research Policy30: 1019-1039. Frankel, E. G. 1990. Management of Technology Change, NewYork: Kluwer Academic. Freel, M. 2003. Sectoral patterns of small firm innovation, networking and proximity. Research Policy 32: 751-770. Freeman, C. 1991. Networks of innovators: a synthesis of research issues. Research Policy 20: 499-514. Griliches, Z. 1990. Patent statistics as economic indicators: A survey. Journal of Economics Literature28: 1661-1707. Garcia-Vega, M., 2006. Does technological diversification promoteinnovation? An empirical analysis for European firms. ResearchPolicy 35: 230-246. George, M. L., J. Works., and K. Watson-Hemphill. 2006. Fast innovation-Achieving Superior Differentiation, Speed to Marked, and Increased Profitability. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill. 95-104, 137-140, 160-161, 187-193. Greve, H. R. 2003. A behavioral theory of R&D expenditures and innovations: evidence from shipbuilding. Academy of Management Journal 46(6): 685-702. Galbraith, C. S. 1990. Transferring core manufacturing technologies in hightechnology firms. California Management Review, 32(4): 56-70 Govindarajan, V., and C. Trimble. 2006. 10 Rules for strategic innovators: 27-30. Hagedoorn, J. 2002. Inter-firm R&D partnerships: An overview of major trends and patterns since1960. Research Policy 31: 477-492. Håkansson, H. 1987. Product development in networks', in Håkansson, H. (ed.).Industrial Technological Development: A Network Approach, Croom Helm: London Hagedoorn J., Duysters, D., 1997. Satisficing strategies in dynamic inter-firm networks. The efficacy of quasi-redundant contacts. MERIT (2/97–016). Henderson, R. M., & Clark, K. B. 1990. Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Administrative Science Quarterly 35: 9-30. Hienerth C, and C. Lettl. 2011. Exploring how peer communities enable lead user innovations to become standard equipment in the industry: community pull effects. Journal of Product Innovation Management 28(1): 175-195. Hill, C. W. I., and G. R. Jones. 1989. Strategic Management Theory. Boston, Houghton Mifflin. VonHippel E. 1988. The Sources of Innovation. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK. VonHippel E. 2005. Democratizing Innovation: Users Take Center Stage. MIT Press: Boston, MA. Howells, J. 1999. Regional systems of innovation?InArchibugi, D., Howells, J. and Michie, J. (eds). Innovation Policy in a Global Economy, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge. Hausman, J. A., B. Hall., and Z. Griliches. 1984. Econometric models for count data with an application to the patents-R&D relationship. Econometrica,52: 909-938. Jaffe, A. B. 1986. Technological opportunity and spillovers of R&D: Evidence from firms' patents, profits and market value. American Economic Review76: 984-1001. Jamrog, J., M. Vickers,and D.Bear. 2006. Building and sustaining a culture that supports innovation. Human Resource Planning 29(3): 9-19. Jovanovic, B., and Y. Nyarko. 1995. A Bayesian learning model fitted to a variety of empirical learning curves. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity Microeconomics1995: 247-305. Kogut, B. 1988. Joint ventures: theoretical and empirical perspectives. Strategic Management Journal 9: 312-332 Lundvall, B-Å. (ed.) (1992), National Systems of Innovation: Toward a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning, Pinter: London. Lilienm, G.L., D. M. Pamela., S. Kathleen., S. Mary., and von Hippel E. 2002. Performance assessment of the lead user idea–generation process for new product development. Management Science 48(8): 1042-1059. Liu, X., and R. S. White. 1997. The relative contributions of foreign technology and domestic inputs to innovation in Chinese manufacturing industries. Technovation 17 (March): 119-125. Long, J. S. 1997. Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage. Luecke, R. 2004. Managing creativity and innovation:10-11, 57-59, 131-132 Murovec, N., and I. Prodan. 2009. Absorptive capacity, its determinants, and influence on innovation output: Cross cultural validation of the structural model. Technovation 29 (December): 859-872. Nonaka, I., and H. Takeushi. 1995. The Knowledge-creating Company. Oxford University Press. Phillips, R. 1997. Innovation and Firm Performance in Australian Manufacturing. Industry Commission, Staff Research Paper. Rivkin, J. W., and N. Siggelkow. 2003. Balancing search and stability: interdependencies among elements organizational design. Management Science 49(3): 290-311. Schumpeter, J. A. 1934. The Theory of Economic Development. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA. Sorenson, O., J. W. Rivkin., and L. Fleming. 2006. Complexity, networks, and knowledge flow. Research Policy, 35: 994-1017. Souitaris, V. 2001. External communication determinants of innovation in the context of a newly industrialised country: a comparison of objective and perceptual results from Greece. Technovation 21 (1): 25-34. Teece, D., G. Pisano., and A. Schuen. 1990. Firm Capabilities, Resources and the Concept of Strategy. CCC Working Paper no. 90-8, University of California. Teece, D. 1992. Competition, cooperation, and innovation: Organizational arrangements for regimes of rapid technological progress. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 18 (June): 1-25 Tidd, J., J.Bessant, and K.Pavitt. 2005. Managing Innovation: Integrating technological, market and organizational change. Third edition. Wiley. Veugelers, R. 1997. Internal R&D expenditures and external technology sourcing. Research Policy 26: 303-315. Walcszuch, R., van Braven, G., and H. Lundgren. 2000. Internet adoption barriers for small firms in the Netherlands. European Management Journal 18(5): 561-572. Wang, Q., and N. Tunzelmann. 2000. Complexity and the functions of the firm: breath and depth. Res Policy 29: 805-818. Wuyts, S., and S. Dutta. 2014. Benefiting from alliance portfolio diversity: The role of past internal knowledge creation strategy. Journal of Management 40: 1653-1674. Yang, H., and C. Phelps., and K. Steensma. 2010. Learning from what others have learned from you: The effects of knowledge spillover on originating firms. Academy of Management Journal 53: 371-389. Yayavaram, S., and G. Ahuja. 2008. Decomposability in knowledge structures and its impact on the usefulness of inventions and knowledge-base malleability. Administrative Science Quarterly 53(2): 333-362. Yayavaram, S., and W. R. Chen. 2013. Changes in Firm Knowledge Couplings and Firm Innovation Performance: The Moderating Role of Technological Complexity. Strategic Management Journal 36(3):377-396.
摘要: 
With great progress in the development of technology, innovation has already become a core issue for enterprises to attend to. Previous research on knowledge and innovation have mainly focused on how internal and external knowledge influence innovation performance. Our study concentrates on exploring the relationship between external knowledge and innovation, especially highlighting spillover knowledge pool. We also examine how changes in firm knowledge couplings and technological complexity moderate the effects of spillover knowledge pool on innovation performance. Taking the firms in semiconductor industry in Taiwan from 2009 to 2012 as samples, the empirical result shows that there is a positive relationship between spillover knowledge pool and innovation performance. As for the moderating effect of changes in firm knowledge coupling,the changes of knowledge basic negatively impact the relationship between spillover knowledge pool and innovation performance. Finally, the moderating effect of technological complexity on the relationship between spillover knowledge pool and innovation performance haven't been empirically supported by our study.

隨著科技與時代的躍進,創新成為企業繼續經營與突破的顯學,而創新即來自知識,過去關於知識與創新之相關研究,多數集中在探討內部知識與外部知識對企業創新績效影響程度或形式,而本研究僅單獨探討外部知識與創新績效間之關係,且特別針對鮮少為人討論之外溢知識庫作為本研究所探討之外部知識,並加入企業知識組成改變與技術複雜度探討其對外溢知識庫與創新績效間的調節關係。本研究的樣本為2009年至2012年上市上櫃之半導體產業,實證結果發現,外溢知識庫對創新績效有正向影響;在企業知識組成改變方面,若外溢知識庫前後之知識基礎改變,則會減弱知識庫對創新之影響;最後,技術複雜度於外溢知識庫與企業創新績效間之調節效果則未獲得實證之支持。
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11455/92574
Rights: 不同意授權瀏覽/列印電子全文服務
Appears in Collections:會計學系所

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat Existing users please Login
nchu-104-7102028021-1.pdf912.43 kBAdobe PDFThis file is only available in the university internal network   
Show full item record
 
TAIR Related Article

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.