Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11455/92590
標題: 企業間聯盟組合之特性與組織績效之關係
The Relationship between the Characteristic of Interfirm Alliance Portfolio and Organizational Performance
作者: I-Ting Hsiao
蕭伊婷
關鍵字: Alliance;Alliance Portfolio Characteristics;Organizational Performance;聯盟;聯盟組合特性;組織績效
引用: 中文部分: 司徒達賢,2005,策略管理新論 : 觀念架構與分析方法 馬維揚,2000,臺灣IC產業垂直分工體系形成之研究,1993-1998,《科技管理學刊》,第5卷 第2期:1-20 英文部分: Ahuja, G. 2000. Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation:A longitudinal study. Administrative Science Quarterly 45: 425-455. Ahuja, G. and R. Katila. 2004. Where do resources come from? The role of idiosyncratic situations. Strategic Management Journal 25 (8-9): 887-907. Anna, S. C. and O. Gina. 2012. Alliance portfolio resource diversity and firm innovation. Journal of Marketing 76 (July): 24-43. Bae, J., and M. Gargiulo. 2004. Partner substitutability, alliance network structure, and firm profitability in the telecommunications industry. Academy of Management Journal 47: 843-859. Baum, J. A. C., T. Calabrese, and B. S. Silverman. 2000. Don't go it alone:Alliance network composition and startups' performance in Canadian biotechnology. Strategic Management Journal 21: 267-294. Beckman, C. M., and P. R. Haunschild. 2002. Network Learning: The Effects of Partners' Heterogeneity of Experience on Corporate Acquisitions. Administrative Science Quarterly 47 (1): 92-124. Burt, R. S. 1992. The social structure of competition. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA. Coleman, J. S. 1988. Social capital in the creation of human capital. The American Journal of Sociology 94: 95-120. Faems, D., M. Janssens, and I. Neyens. 2012. Alliance portfolios and innovation performance:Connecting structural and managerial perspectives. Group and Organization Management 37 (2): 241-268. Friedkin, N. E. 1981. The development of structure in random networks: an analysis of the effects of increasing network density on five measures of structure. Social Network 3 (1): 41-52. Freeman, L. C. 1979. Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Social Networks 1: 215-239. Griliches, Z. 1990. Patent statistics as economic indicators: a survey part I. Cambridge, MA. Goerzen, A., and P. W. Beamish. 2005. The effect of alliance network diversity onmultinational enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal 26: 333-354. Gulati, R. 1998. Alliances and networks. Strategic Management Journal 19: 293-317. Hoffmann, W. H. 2005. How to manage a portfolio of alliances. Long Range Planning 38: 121-143. Inkpen, A. C. 2000. Learning through joint ventures: A framework of knowledge acquisition. Journal of Management Studies 37: 1019-1043. Jiang, R. J., Q. T. Tao, and M. D. Santoro. 2010. Alliance portfolio diversity and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal 31: 1136-1144. Jensen, M. C. 1989. Eclipse of the public corporation. Harvard Business Review (Sep.) Lahiri, N., and S. Narayanan. 2013. Vertical integration, innovation, and alliance portfolio size:Implications for firm performance. Strategic Management Journal 34: 1042-1064. Lavie, D. 2007. Alliance portfolios and firm performance:A study of value creation and appropriation in the U.S. software industry. Strategic Management Journal 28: 1187-1212. Lavie, D., and S. R. Miller. 2008. Alliance portfolio internationalization and firm performance. Organization Science 19: 623-646. Liu, C. H. 2011. The effects of innovation alliance on network structure and density of cluster. Expert Systems with Applications 38: 299-305. Mahmood, I. P., H. Zhu, and E. J. Zajac. 2011. Where can capabilities come from?Network ties and capability acquisition in business groups. Strategic Management Journal 32: 820-848. Miller, S. R., and L. Eden. 2006. Local density and foreign subsidiary performance. Academy of Management Journal 49 (2): 341-355. Parise, S., and A. Casher. 2003. Alliance portfolios:Designing and managing your network of business-partner relationships. Academy of Management Executive 17 (4): 25-39. Phelps, C. C. 2010. A longitudinal study of the influence of alliance network structure and composition on firm exploratory innovation. Academy of Management Journal 53 (4): 890-913. Ramezani, C. A., L. Soenen, and A. Jung. 2002. Growth, corporate profitability, and value creation. Financial Analysts Journal 58 (6): 56-67. Rothaermel, F. K., M. A. Hitt, and L. A. Jobe. 2006. Balancing vertical integration and strategic outsourcing:Effects on product portfolio, product success, and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal 27: 1033-1056 Rowley, T., Behrens, and D. Krackhardt. 2000. Redundant governance structures:An analysis of relational embeddedness in the steel and semiconductor industries. Strategic Management Journal 21: 369-386. Sampson, R. C. 2007. R&D alliances and firm performance:The impact of technological diversity and alliance organization on innovation. Academy of Management Journal 50 (2): 364-386. Schillings, M. A., and C. C. Phelps. 2007. Interfirm collaboration networks: The impact of large-scale network structure on firm innovation. Management Science 53 (7): 1113-1126. Shan, W., G. Walker, and B. Kogut. 1994. Interfirm cooperation and startup innovation in the biotechnology industry. Strategic Management Journal 15: 387-394. Shaner J., and M. M. Imd. 2011. The relationship between networks, institutional development, and performance in foreign investments. Strategic Management Journal 32: 556-568. Shaw, J. D., J. L. Johnson, and D. E. Lockhart. 2005. Turnover, social capital losses, and performance. Academy of Management Journal 48 (4): 594-606. Soh, P. H. 2010. Network patterns and competitive advantage before the emergence of a dominant design. Strategic Management Journal 31:438-461. Sorensen, J. B., and T. E. Stuart. 2000. Aging, obsolescence, and organizational innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly 45 (1): 81-112. Tsai, W. 2000. Social capital, strategic relatedness and the formation of intraorganizational linkages. Strategic Management Journal 21: 925-939. Uzzi, B. 1997. Social structure and competition in interfirm networks:The paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly 42: 35-67. Uzzi, B. 1996. The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance for the economic performance of organizations. American Sociological Review 61: 674-698. Wassmer, U. 2010. Alliance portfolios:A review and research agenda. Journal of management 36 (1): 141-171. Wuyts, S., and S. Dutta. 2012. Benefiting from alliance portfolio diversity:The role of past internal knowledge creation strategy. Journal of Management Yu, S. H., and W. T. Chiu. 2013. Social networks and corporate performance: The moderating role of technical uncertainty. Journal of Managerial Issues 1: 26-45.
摘要: 
本研究探討聯盟組合特性與組織績效之非線性關係,檢視聯盟組合是否有益於公司,本研究以國內公開上市上櫃之公司為研究對象,選取半導體產業和電腦及週邊設備業,研究結果發現聯盟組合特性與財務績效並無顯著的非線性關係,亦即組織之財務績效並不會受到聯盟組合特性的影響,但聯盟組合特性與創新績效具有顯著的倒U型關係,顯示聯盟組合多樣性、中心性和密度增加時,對創新績效有正向影響,但當它超過一個臨界值時,對創新績效的影響反而下降,意謂著適當的聯盟組合特性能為公司帶來創新上的效益,此研究發現可作為管理者在參與聯盟時的參考指標。
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11455/92590
Rights: 不同意授權瀏覽/列印電子全文服務
Appears in Collections:會計學系所

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat Existing users please Login
nchu-103-7101028004-1.pdf1.91 MBAdobe PDFThis file is only available in the university internal network   
Show full item record
 

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.