Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11455/93259
標題: 臺中市歷史建築維護成效之探討:公私協力治理觀點
Inquiring the Maintenance Effectiveness of the Historical Building in Taichung City: Perspective of Public-Private Collaborative Governance
作者: 謝岱芬
Dai-Fen Xie
關鍵字: 協力;治理;歷史建築;collaboration;governance;historical building
引用: 一、中文部分  (一)專書 吳定﹙2005﹚。《公共政策辭典》﹙修訂三版﹚。臺北市:五南。 林水波、李長晏﹙2005﹚。《跨域治理》。臺北市:五南。 林淑馨﹙2010﹚。《質性研究:理論與實務》。臺北市:巨流。 韓培爾﹙2003﹚。《社會科學研究方法Q&A》。臺北市:風雲論壇。  (二)期刊論文 吳英明﹙1993﹚。〈公私部門協力關係和「公民參與」之探討〉。《中國行政評論》,第2卷第3期,頁1-14。 張秦瑞、孫同文、郭瑞坤、沈逸晴﹙2013﹚。〈地方觀光發展協力治理機制之探究:以南投縣觀光發展為例〉。《觀光休閒學報》,第19卷第2期,頁105-128。 陳立剛(2009)。〈由地方政府到協力治理〉。《臺灣民主季刊》,第6卷第4期,頁247-251。 陳金貴﹙2013﹚。〈治理之理論與發展〉。《公共治理季刊》,第1卷第1期,頁25-36。 陳恆鈞﹙2010﹚。〈協力網絡治理之優點與罩門〉。《研習論壇精選》,第三輯單元二,頁165-190。 曾冠球(2011)。〈協力治理觀點下公共管理者的挑戰與能力建立〉。《文官制度季刊》,第3卷第1期,頁27-52。  (三)研討會論文 李長晏、林煥笙﹙2009﹚。〈從協力治理觀點分析嘉義縣朴子溪環境汙染整治計畫〉。發表於TASPAA年會暨全球化下新公共管理趨勢與挑戰─理論與實踐國際學術研討會,國立中山大學公共事務管理研究所主辦,高雄﹙2009年5月23-24日﹚。 李長晏、林煥笙、曾淑娟﹙2012﹚。〈邁向更實質的公共參與─協力治理概念意涵與分析途徑之探討〉。發表於臺灣公共行政與公共事務系所聯合會暨永續治理:新環境、新願景國際學術研討會,國立成功大學主辦,臺南市﹙2012年5月25-27日﹚。  (四)學位論文 朱復陽﹙2007﹚。《協力治理應用於眷村改建之研究─以桃園縣陸光新城為例─》。淡江大學公共行政學系公共政策碩士在職專班碩士論文,未出版,臺北。 林大豐﹙2010﹚。《從協力治理觀點解析三義木雕文化產業之發展》。國立中興大學國家政策與公共事務研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺中。 張孝文﹙2013﹚。《新北市國際環境藝術節之公私協力治理分析》。淡江大學公共行政學系公共政策碩士班碩士論文,未出版,臺北。 張秦瑞﹙2007﹚。《地方觀光發展協力治理機制之探究─以南投縣觀光產業聯盟協會為觀察焦點》。國立暨南國際大學公共行政與政策學系碩士論文,未出版,南投。 陳育正﹙2009﹚。《地方文化產業協力治理之分析─以三峽藍染文化產業為例》。國立臺灣大學政治學系碩士論文,未出版,臺北。 賴貞男﹙2009﹚。《公私協力治理理論與應用─以屏東縣黑鮪魚文化觀光季為例》。國立臺灣師範大學政治學研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北。  (五)研究報告 王順治(2009)。《文化資產保存法有關古蹟歷史建築指定登錄之研究》。內政部建築研究所,未出版。 孫全文(2003)。《歷史建築臺中放送局保存修復之調查研究及修復規劃》。臺中市政府委託計畫,臺中市:臺中市政府。 徐裕健(2003)。《臺中市政府歷史建築臺中刑務所演武場保存修復之調查研究及修復規劃報告》。臺中市政府文化局委託,臺中市:臺中市政府文化局。 郭俊沛(2007)。《臺中市歷史建築:歷史建築臺中刑務所演武場火災後清理及紀錄作業工作計畫成果報告書》。行政院文化建設委員會、臺中市政府指導,臺中市:臺中市文化局。 陳柏年(2005)。《歷史建築「臺中放送局」修復工程工作報告書》。臺中市文化局委託,臺中市:臺中市文化局。  (六)譯著 潘中道、胡龍騰﹙2010﹚。《研究方法:步驟化學習指南》﹙修訂二版﹚﹙Ranjit Kumar原著﹚。臺北市:學富文化。  (七)官方資料 徐慧民、邱上嘉、張嘉祥(2008)。〈臺中放送局〉。《九二一地震歷史建築修復成果專輯(一)》,2008年。 蔡惠欣(2013)。〈臺中刑務所演武場建構政府與民間夥伴關係推動實例〉。《102年度「地方治理標竿論壇」案例彙編》,2013年11月。  (八)電子資源 立法院(2009)。〈文化資產保存法〉,2013年12月23日。取自《立法院法律系統》,http://lis.ly.gov.tw/lgcgi/lglaw。 立法院(2009)。〈文化資產保存法〉,2013年12月21日。取自《立法院法律系統》,http://lis.ly.gov.tw/lgcgi/lglaw。 道禾六藝文化館(2013)。〈道禾六藝文化館園區簡介〉,2013年12月19日。取自《道禾六藝文化館網站》,http://sixarts.org.tw/_b_about%20us/index.php?action=list&show_inm_no=1352252705。 文化部文化資產局(2013)。〈文化資產個案導覽〉,2013年12月21日。取自《文化部文化資產局網站》,http://www.boch.gov.tw/boch/frontsite/cultureassets/caseBasicInfoAction.do?method=doViewCaseBasicInfo&caseId=BA09602000589&version=1&assetsClassifyId=1.2&menuId=302。 永進木器廠(2013)。〈TAIWAN DESIGN SHOP〉,2013年12月20日。取自《臺中放送局》,http://www.fun-song.tw/play.php。 Google(2013)。〈臺中刑務所演武場〉,2014年7月17日。取自《Google地圖網站》,https://www.google.com.tw/maps/place/%E5%88%91%E5%8B%99%E6%89%80%E6%BC%94%E6%AD%A6%E5%A0%B4/@24.134379,120.673899,17z/data=!3m1!4b1!4m2!3m1!1s0x34693d0f11e30129:0x8ae63b8582eab508?hl=zh-TW。 法務部(2014)。2014年7月15日。取自《全國法規資料庫》,http://law.moj.gov.tw/Index.aspx。 二、西文部分 (一)專書 Agranoff, R. (2012). Collaborating to Manage: A Primer for the Public Sector. Washington: Georgetown University Press. Agranoff, R., & M. McGuire (2003). Collaborative Public Management: New Strategies for Local Governments. Washington: Georgetown University Press. Alter, C., & J. Hage (1993). Organizations Working Together. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications. Bardach, E. (1998). Getting Agencies to Work Together: The Practice and Theory of Managerial Craftsmanship, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press. Bevir, M. (2009). Key Concepts in Governance. Lodon: Sage Publications. Blau, P. M. (2009). Exchange and Power in Social Life. New York: Transaction Publishers. Fountain, J. E. (2001). Building the Virtual State: Information Technology and Institutional Change. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press. Moore, M. H. (1995). Creating Public Value: Strategic Management in Government. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Moynihan, D. P. (2007). From Forest Fires to Hurrican Katrina: Case Studies of Incident Command Systems. Washington, DC: IBM Center for the Business of Government. Saint-Onge, H., & C. Armstrong. (2004). The Conductive Organization. Burlington, MA: Elsevier. Sullivan, H., & C. Skelcher (2002). Working Across Boundaries: Collaboration in Public Services. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan. (二)期刊論文 Ansell, C., & A. Gash (2007). Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4): 543–571. Bentrup, G. (2001). Evaluation of a Collaborative Model: A Case Study Analysis of Watershed Planning in the Intermountain West. Environmental Management, 27(5): 739–748. Bryson, J. M., B. C. Crosby, & M. M. Stone (2006). The Design and Implementation of Cross-Sector Collaborations: Propositions from the Literature. Public Administration Review, 66(Special Issue): 44-55. Davies, A. L., & R. M. White (2012). Collaboration in Natural Resource Governance: Reconciling Stakeholder Expectations in Deer Management in Scotland. Journal of Environmental Management, 112(18): 160-169. Emerson, K., T. Nabatchi, & S. Balogh (2011). An Integrative Framework for Collaborative Governance. Journal of Public Administration Research, 22(1): 1-29. Emerson, R. M. (1962). Power-Dependence Relations. American Sociological Review, 27(1): 31-41. Halachmi, A. (2005). Governance and Risk Management: Challenges and Public Productivity. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 18(4): 300-317. Hood, C. (1991). A Public Management For All Seasons?. Public Administration, 69(1): 3-19. Howlett, M., & J. Rayner (2006). Globalization and Governance Capacity: Explaining Divergence in National Forest Programs as Instances of 'Next-Generation' Regulation in Canada and Europe. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions, 19(2): 251-275. Huxham, C., & S. Vangen (2000). Ambiguity, Complexity and Dynamics in the Membership of Collaboration. Human relations, 53(6): 771-806. Innes, J. E., & D. E. Booher (1999). Consensus Building and Complex Adaptive Systems: A Framework for Evaluating Collaborative Planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 65(4): 412 -423. Kapucu, N., F. Yuldashev, & E. Bakiev (2009). Collaborative Public Management and Collaborative Governance: Conceptual Similarities and Differences. European Journal of Economic and Political Studies, 2(1): 39-60. Lasker, R. D., & E. S. Weiss (2003). Broadening Participation in Community Problem Solving: a Multidisciplinary Model to Support Collaborative Practice and Research. Journal of Urban Health: Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 80(1): 14-47. Levine, S., & P. E. White (1961). Exchange as a Conceptual Framework for the Study of Interorganizational Relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly, 5(4): 583-601. Logsdon, J. M. (1991). Interests and Interdependence in the Formation of Social Problem-Solving Collaborations. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 27(1): 23–37. Ostrom, E. (2007). A Diagnostic Approach for Going Beyond Panaceas. Proceedings of the national Academy of sciences, 104(39): 15181-15187. Rhodes, R. A. W. (1996). The New Governance: Governing without Government. Political Studies, XLIV: 652-667. Ryan, C. M. (2001). Leadership in Collaborative Policy-Making: An Analysis of Agency Roles in Regulatory Negotiations. Policy Sciences, 34: 221-245. Selin, S., & D. Chavez(1995). Developing a Collaborative Model for Environmental Planning and Management. Environmental Management, 19(2): 189-195. Smith, M., & M. Beazley (2000). Progrssive Regrimes, Partnerships and the Involvement of Local Communities: A Framework for Evaluation. Public Administration, 78(4): 855–878. Vangen, S., & C. Huxham (2003). Nurturing Collaborative Relations: Building Trust in Interorganizational Collaboration. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 39(1): 5-31. Vernon, J., S. Essex, D. Pinder, & C. Kaja (2005). Collaborative Policymaking: Local Sustainable Projects. Annals of Tourism Research, 32(2): 325-345. Yee, A. S. (2004). Cross-National Concepts in Supranational Governance: State–Society Relations and EU Policy Making. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions, 17(4): 487–524. (三)專書論文 Enroth, H. (2010). Policy Network Theory. In M. Bevir (Ed.), The SAGE Handbook of Governance (19-35). London: Sage Publications. Frederickson, H. G. (2007). Whatever happened to public administration? Governance, governance everywhere. In E. Ferlie, L. E. Lynn & C. Pollitt(Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of public management (282-304). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. Himmelman, A. T. (1996). On the Theory and Practice of Transformational Collaboration: From Social Service to Social Justice. In C. Huxham (Ed.), Creating Collaborative Advantage (19-43). London: Sage Publications. John, D., S. Alan, & T. Smita (2006). Ethics, Trust and the Public Interest: The Contending Modes of Societal Governance. In K. Nada & K. Andrew (Eds.), Governance, Strategy and Policy (6-38). Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan. Kalu, K. N. (2006). Citizenship, Administrative Responsibility, and Participation in Governance: One More Look. In K. Nada & K. Andrew (Eds.), Governance, Strategy and Policy (73-93). Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan. (四)研討會論文 Zhikui, L., Z. Nan, & M. Qingguo (2010). Understanding Cross-Sector Collaboration in E-Government Development: Theoretical Consideration Based on Extended Bryson's Framework. Paper presented at the 2010Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems, Taipei (9-12 July 2010). (五)未發表論文 Himmelman, A. T. (2002). Collaboration for a Change: Definitions, Decision-Making Models, Roles, and Collaboration Process Guide. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Minnesota State University, Minneapolis. (六)報紙與官方資料 Yaarit, S. & T. Robert (2011). Enhancing Collaboration: Malaysian Business.
摘要: 
As the result of the complex public problems that result from the development of globalization and innovative information technology, public sectors cannot solve problems by intergovernmental relationship and local self-government. Hence, collaborative governance was evolved to reach the common goals and there are coordination, integration, and communication between public sector, private sector, and the third sector by crossing sectors and boundaries.
Based on the literatures of collaborative governance models and seven collaborative governance theories: collaborative empowerment theory, regime theory, exchange theory, resource dependency theory, evolutionary theory, policy networks theory, and new institutional theory, this paper tries to introduce an analytic framework by reviews of literatures. And this research conducts analyses of collaborative governance, including collaborative drivers, collaborative actions, principled engagement, shared motivation, capacity for joint action, impacts and adaptation. The research adopts in-depth interview to inquiry the effective factors of the collaborative governance, collaborative form, factors affecting collaborative and the influence for local economy and organizational performance. The objects are Natural way six arts cultural center and Taichung broadcasting bureau.
The research findings: in collaborative drivers, leadership and uncertainty both promote collaborative. In Natural way six arts cultural center, consequential promote collaborative as well. Collaborative forms are: the trust both based on the contract, cultural resources shared between public sector, private and the third sectors, meetings once a month as the mechanism to coordinate, and consensus for repair of the historical buildings. Principled engagement, shared motivation, capacity for joint action all affect the collaborative of two research objects. There are fine impacts for local economy in two research objects and the organizational performance of Natural way six arts cultural center is better than Taichung broadcasting bureau.

面對全球化發展以及資訊科技日新月異所帶來的複雜公共問題,公部門無法透過「府際關係」與「地方自治」有效解決問題,因此,發展出與私部門及第三部門之協力夥伴關係,透過跨部門、跨區域之協調、整合與溝通來達成共同目標。

本研究回顧整合性協力治理模式與協力治理七個理論,協力授能理論、體制理論、交易理論、資源依賴理論、演化理論、政策網絡理論、新制度論,進一步瞭解協力治理內涵,並以整合性協力治理架構為基礎,提出本研究架構,以協力驅力、協力行動、有條件參與、共享動機、聯合行動的能力、影響、適應為研究分析構面,並回顧相關文獻,發現相關研究因研究上限制,僅能就單一個案進行詮釋性的研究,因此,本研究以臺中市歷史建築第三部門經營之臺中刑務所演武場與私部門經營之臺中放送局作為個案,運用深度訪談法進行研究,希冀得出促成有效協力之因素、協力形式、影響協力進行之因素以及對組織績效與地方經濟之影響。

本研究發現,協力驅力中,領導、不確定性確實促進研究個案與政府部門之協力。臺中刑務所演武場個案中,間接誘因也確實促進與政府部門之協力。協力形式中,信任之基礎皆建立於契約,協力過程中,政府部門與私部門及第三部門進行文化資源之共享,每個月月例會為溝通協調機制,歷史建築之修繕也具有共識。有條件參與、共享動機、聯合行動的能力,皆影響本研究個案協力之進行。本研究個案對於地方經濟確實有正面影響,而臺中刑務所演武場之第三部門組織績效較臺中放送局之私部門組織績效優。
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11455/93259
Rights: 同意授權瀏覽/列印電子全文服務,2017-08-31起公開。
Appears in Collections:國家政策與公共事務研究所

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat Existing users please Login
nchu-103-7101091001-1.pdf3.74 MBAdobe PDFThis file is only available in the university internal network    Request a copy
Show full item record
 
TAIR Related Article

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.