Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11455/97265
標題: 臺灣釣客對墾丁珊瑚礁保育之偏好
Anglers'' Preferences for the Conservation of Coral Reefs in Kenting National Park
作者: 吳冠勳
Guan-Xin Wu
關鍵字: 選擇實驗法;珊瑚礁;釣客;願付價格;Choice Experiment;Coral Reefs;Anglers;Willingness-to-pay
引用: 參考資料 一、中文部分: 方力行. (1989). 珊瑚學-兼論台灣的珊瑚資源. 台北市: 黎明文化事業股份有限公司. 方彥博, 黃祥晟, & 李貽鴻. (2012). 馬祖群島外來海岸釣客對於海釣活動環境空間滿意度之研究. 休閒研究, 四 (二), 頁 15-44. 王威翔. (2011). 影響釣客對釣魚許可證願付價格之相關因素-臺南安平南北堤為調查基地. 碩士論文, 國立台南大學, 生態旅遊碩士班, 台南市. 王惠民. (2005). 東北角海岸岸釣發展潛力、效益評估及其管理制度建構之研究. 碩士論文, 國立臺灣海洋科技大學, 海洋資源管理研究所, 基隆市. 何立德, & 王鑫. (2002). 台灣的珊瑚礁. 新北市: 遠足文化事業股份有限公司. 孟培傑, 鍾國南, 陳正平, 陳明輝, 劉銘欽, 張揚祺, 等. (2007). 人為行為對墾丁國家公園海域生態衝擊之長期監測研究. 國家公園學報, 17 (2), 頁 89-111. 林晏州, & 顏家芝. (1995). 釣客特性與其對釣魚環境屬性需求之研究. 戶外遊憩研究, 8 (1), 頁 83-98. 林連池. (2002). 海岸遊憩釣者專業層次、釣魚動機與其釣魚環境屬性需求之研究-以高雄縣茄萣鄉興達港區水域為例. 體育研究所. 桃園市: 國立體育學院. 曹正, & 李瑞瓊. (1989). 觀光地區遊憩活動設施規劃設計準則研究報告. 台北市: 交通部觀光局. 莊慶達. (2001). 臺灣休閒漁業之發展與策略. 中國水產月刊, 571, 頁 43-56. 陳明健, 莊慶達, 陳凱俐, 鄭蕙燕, 蕭景楷, 吳珮瑛, 等. (2003). 自然資源與環境經濟學. 台北市: 雙葉書廊有限公司. 趙世民, & 蘇焉. (2000). 海中的熱帶雨林-珊瑚礁. 台中市: 國立自然科學博物館. 蕭代基. (2008). 台灣環境保護永續發展的展望. 於 薛天棟 (編輯), 臺灣的展望. 台北市: 華泰書局. 蕭代基, 鄭蕙燕, 吳珮瑛, 錢玉蘭, & 溫麗琪. (2002). 環境保護之成本效益分析:理論、方法與應用. 台北市: 俊傑書局股份有限公司. 戴昌鳳. (1997a). 珊瑚與珊瑚. 屏東縣: 內政部營建署墾丁國家公園管理處. 戴昌鳳. (1997b). 墾丁國家公園-珊瑚之美. 屏東縣: 內政部營建署墾丁國家公園管理處. 戴昌鳳. (2011). 台灣珊瑚礁地圖(上)台灣本島篇. 台北市: 天下遠見出版股份有限公司. 戴昌鳳, 黃建華, 洪聖雯, 鄭安怡, 鄭有容, 何旻杰, 等. (2007). 墾丁國家公園海域珊瑚礁總體驗. 墾丁國家公園管理處委託辦理計畫報告, 國立台灣大學, 海洋所, 台北市. 二、英文部分: Adamowicz, Wiktor; Louviere, Jordan; Williams, M;. (1994). Combining Revealed and Stated Preference Methods for Valuing Environmental Amenities. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management , 26, pp. 271-292. Arlinghaus, R. (2006). Overcoming human obstacles to conservation of recreational fishery resources, with emphasis on central Europe. Environmental Conservation , 33 (1), pp. 46-59. Arlinghaus, R., & Mehner, T. (2005). Determinants of management preferences of recreational anglers in Germany: Habitat management versus fish stocking. Limnologica , 35, pp. 2-17. Arlinghaus, R., Bork, M., & Fladung, E. (2008). Understanding the heterogeneity of recreational anglers across an urban-rural gradient in a metropolitan area (Berlin, Germany),with implications for fisheries management. Fisheries Research , 92, pp. 53-62. Barcellini, V. C., Motta, F. S., Martins, A. M., & Moro, P. S. (2013). Recreational anglers ad fishing guides from an estuarine protected area in southeastern Brazil: Socioeconomic characteristics and views on fisheries management. Ocean & Coastal Management , 76, pp. 23-29. Burton, M., Rigby, D., Young, T., & James, S. (2001). Consumer attitudes to genetically modified organisms in food in the UK. European Review of Agricultural Economics , 28 (4), pp. 479-498. Can, Özge; Alp, Emre;. (2012). Valuation of environmental improvements in a specially protected marine area: A choice experiment approach in Göcek Bay, Turkey. Science of The Total Environment , 439, pp. 291-298. Cardona, F., & Morales-Nin, B. (2013). Anglers'' perceptions of recreational fisheries and fisheries management in Mallorca. Ocean & Coastal Management , 82, pp. 146-150. Carson, R. T., Louviere, J. J., Anderson, D. A., Arabie, P., Hensher, D. A., Johnson, R. M., et al. (1994). Experimental Analysis of Choice. Marketing Letters , 5 (4), pp. 351-368. Cesar, H. (1996). Economic Analysis of Indonesian Coral Reefs. The World Bank . Cesar, Herman; Burke, Lauretta; Pet-Soede, Lida;. (2003). The Economics of Worldwide Coral Reef Degradation. Arnhem: Cesar Environmental Economics Consulting(CEEC). Christie, M. (1999). An Examination of Factors affecting the Disparity between Hypothetical and Actual Willingness to Pay. Agricultural Economics Society conference. Belfast. Cinner, J. (2014). Coral reef livelihoods. Evvironmental Sustainablility , 7, pp. 66-71. Ciriacy-Wantrup, S. V. (1947). Capital Returns from Soil-Conservation Practices. Journal Farm Economics , 29, pp. 1181-1196. Cooke, S. J., & Cowx, I. G. (2004). The Role of Recreational Fishing in Global Fish Crises. BioScience , 54 (9), pp. 857-859. Cooke, S., & Cowx, I. G. (2006). Contrasting recreational and commercial fishing :Searching for common issues to promote unified conservation of fisheries resources and aquatic environments. Biological Conservation , 128, pp. 93-108. Danaldson, M. R., O''Connor, C. M., Thompson, L. A., Gingerich, A. J., Danylchuk, S. E., Duplain, R. R., et al. (2011). Contrasting global game fish and non-game fish species. Fisheries , 36, pp. 385-397. Davis, R. K. (1963). Recreational Planning as an Economic Problem. Natural Resources Journal , 3, pp. 239-249. Dellaert, B., Borgers, A., & Timmermans, H. (1995). A Day in City:Using Conjoint Choice Experiments to Model Urban Tourists Choice of Activity Packages. Tourism Management , 16 (5), pp. 347-353. Forster, Vivien; Bateman, Ian J; Harley, David;. (1997). Real and hypothetical willingness to pay for environmental preservation :a non-experimental comparison. Journal of Agricultural Economics , 48 (1-3), pp. 123-137. Gan, E. C., & Luzar, J. E. (1993). A Conjoint Analysis of Waterfowl Hunting in Louisiana. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , 25 (2), pp. 36-45. Gill, David A; Schuhmann, Peter W; Oxenford, Hazel A;. (2015). Recreational diver preferences for reef fish attributes :Economic implications of future change. Ecological Economics , 111, pp. 48-57. Glass, R. J., More, T. A., Siemer, W. F., Batcheller, G. R., & DiStefano, J. J. (1991). Trappers in New York and Vermont: Comparisons of Social Characteristics and Motivations. Proceedings of the 1991 Northeastern Recreation Reserch Symposium. USDA Forest Service Station. Grafeld, Shanna; Oleson, Kirsten; Barnes, Michele; Peng, Marcus; Chan, Catherine; Weijerman, Mariska;. (2016). Divers'' willingness to pay for improved coral reef conditions in Guam:An untapped source of funding for management and conservation. Ecological Economics , 128, pp. 202-213. Hanemann, M. (1984). Welfare Evaluations in Contingent Valuation Experiments with Discrete Responses. American Journal of Agricultural Economics , 66 (3), pp. 332-341. Hanley, Nick; Mourato, Susana; Wright, Robert E. (2001). Choice modeling approaches:a superior alternative for environmental valuation? Journal of Economic Survey , 15, pp. 435-462. Hoegh-Guldberg, O. (1999). Climate change,coral bleaching and the future of the world''s coral reefs. Marine Freshwater Research , 50, pp. 839-66. Hynes, Stephen; Tinch, Dugald; Hanley , Nick;. (2013). Valuing improvements to coastal waters using choice experiments:An application to revisions of the EU Bathing Waters Directive. Marine Policy , 40, pp. 137-144. Jameson, S., Marcus, J., & Spalding, M. (1995). State of the Reefs:Regional and Global Perspectives. National Oceanic and Atmospherice Administration, Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management. U.S. Department of Commerce. Jobstvogt, Niels; Hanley, Nick; Hynes, Stephen; Kenter, Jasper; Witte, Ursula;. (2014). Twenty thousand sterling under the sea:Estimating the value of protecting deep-sea biodiversity. Ecological Economics , 97, pp. 10-19. Lancaster, K. J. (1966). A New Approach to Consumer Theory. Journal of Political Economy , 74 (2), pp. 132-157. Louviere, Jordan J; Hensher, David A; Swait, Jaffre D;. (2000). Stated Choice Methods:Analysis and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. McFadden, D. (1973). Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behavior. (P. Zarembka, Ed.) New York: Frontiers in Econometrics. Moberg, F., & Folke, C. (1999). Ecological goods and services of coral reef ecosystems. Ecological Economics , 29, pp. 215-233. Morrison, M. D., Blamey, R. K., Bennett, J. W., & Louviere, J. J. (1996). A Comparison of Stated Preference Techniques for Estimating Environmental Values. University College. Canberra: The University of New South Wales. Odum, H. T., & Odum, E. P. (1955, 7). Trophic Structure and Productivity of a Windward Coral Reef Community on Eniwetok Atoll. Ecological Monographs , 25 (3), pp. 291-320. Pandolfi, John M; Bradbury, Roger H; Sala, Enric; Hughes, Terence P; Bjorndal, Karen A; Cooke, Richard G; McArdle, Deborch; McClenachan, Loren; Newman, Marah J.H; Paredes, Gustavo; Warner, Robert R; Jackson, Jeremy B.C;. (2003). Global Trajectories of the Long-Term Decline of Coral Reef Ecosystems. Science , 301, pp. 955-958. Richmond, R. H. (1993). Coral Reefs: Present Problems and Future Concerns Resulting from Anthropogenic Disturbance. American Zoologist , 33 (6), pp. 524-536. Ruddle, K., & Segi, S. (2006). The Management of Inshore Marine Recreational Fishing in Japan. Coastal Mangement , 34, pp. 87-110. Salvat, B. (1992). Coral reefs-a challenging ecosystem for human societies. Global Environmental Change , 2, pp. 12-18. Schuhmann, Peter W; Casey , James F; Horrocks, Julia A; Oxenford, Hazel;. (2013). Recreational SCUBA divers'' willingness to pay for marine biodiversity in Barbados. Journal of Environmental Management , 121, pp. 29-36. Smith, S. (1978). Coral-reef area and the contributions of reefs to processes and resources of the world''s oceans. Nature , 273, pp. 225-226. Souter, D. W., & Linden, O. (2000). The health and future of coral reef systems. Ocean & Coastal management , 43, pp. 657-688. Taylor, Tim; Longo, Alberto;. (2010). Valuing algal bloom in the Black Sea Coast of Bulgaria:A choice experiments approach. Journal of Environmental , 91, pp. 1963-1971. Teh, Louise S.L; Teh, Lydia C.L; Sumaila, U.Rashid;. (2013). A Global Estimate of the Number of Coral Reef Fishers. PLoS ONE , 8, p. e65397. Train, K. E. (2003). Discrete Choice Methods with simulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Tseng, W. W.-c., Hsu, S.-h., & Chen, C.-C. (2015). Estimating the willingness to pay to protect coral reefs from potential damage caused by climate change-The evidence from Taiwan. Marine Pollution Bulletin , 101, pp. 556-565. Veron, J. (1986). Corals of Australia and the Indo-Pacific Book Review. London: Angus and Roberston. Wallmo, Kristy; Lew, Daniel K;. (2011). Valuing improvements to threatened and endangered marine species:An application of stated preference choice experiments. Journal of Environmental Management , 92, pp. 1793-1801. Wattage, P; Glenn, H; Mardle, S; Van Rensburg, T; Grehan, A; Foley, N;. (2011). Economic value of conserving deep-sea corals in Irish water:A choice experiment study on marine protected areas. Fisheries Research , 107, pp. 59-67. Wikinson, Buddemeier R; Clive, Rober W;. (1994). Global Climate Change and Coral Reefs: Implications for People and Reefs. Gland: IUCN. Wikinson, C. (2000). Status of Coral Reefs of the Workd:2000. Australian Institute of Marine Science. Townsville: Global Coral Reef Monitoring Network(GCRMN). 三、網站部分: Deloitte Access Economics. (2017). The economic, social and icon value of the Great BarrierReef. Retrieved 7 07, 2017, from https://www2.deloitte.com/au/en/misc/search.html#qr=great%20barrier%20reef 中華民國內政部營建署. (2011年11月17日). 墾丁國家公園保護利用管制原則【公告】.2016年10月4日 擷取自 http://www.cpami.gov.tw/chinese/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=10646&Itemid=100 中華民國交通部觀光局. (2017). 2016年國內主要觀光遊憩據點遊客人數月別統計【觀光統計年報】. 2017年7月6日 擷取自 http://admin.taiwan.net.tw/statistics/year.aspx?no=134 內政部警政署保安警察第七總隊第八大隊. (無日期). 大隊編制【公告】. 2016年11月10日 擷取自 http://www.7spc.gov.tw/btln8/index.php?catid=163&id=44 行政院農委會漁業署. (2013年3月25日). 統計搭乘娛樂漁業漁船出海從事海釣遊客人次【意見交流】. 2016年11月04日 擷取自 http://www.fa.gov.tw/cht/ForumsGuest/content.aspx?id=20107531&chk=02697b79-da45-4438-8704-dceb18152d0a 林育朱. (2017). 珊瑚礁體檢成果:台灣環境資訊協會. 2017年5月11日 擷取自 台灣環境資訊協會 網站: http://teia.tw/zh-hant/seawatch/event/12384/report/13339 墾丁國家公園管理處. (2016年1月29日). 墾管處公告許可垂釣地點【公告】. 2016年11月15日 擷取自 中華民國內政部營建署: http://www.cpami.gov.tw/chinese/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=19570&Itemid=54
摘要: 
珊瑚礁為生物多樣性最豐富的生態體系之一,除了對海洋生態平衡極為重要之外,珊瑚礁在人類的社會、經濟、文化及醫療等方面亦有極大的貢獻。全球有超過一百個國家的海岸擁有珊瑚礁,而臺灣在氣候及地理位置方面得天獨厚,具有全世界1/3的珊瑚礁種類,其中,以恆春半島與離島等地區最為豐富。由於我國墾丁地區擁有豐富的海洋資源,吸引為數眾多的釣客前往從事垂釣活動,但釣魚活動對海洋環境可能產生的負面影響卻容易被忽略,相關釣客管理制度推動腳步緩慢。考量世界各地的珊瑚礁生態正面臨退化的問題,而臺灣的墾丁地區亦不例外,制定珊瑚礁的保育政策以減少人為干擾是維護海洋資源永續發展的重要工作。故本文以釣客為研究對象,探討其對墾丁珊瑚礁永續生存管理方案之偏好。研究方法採用選擇實驗法(Choice experiment method, CE),藉由面訪問卷的調查方式探討受訪釣客對保育墾丁珊瑚礁的偏好,並透過多元羅吉特模型分別估算「釣魚人數管制」、「禁漁措施」、「海洋保育警察」以及「岸內垂釣點管制」等屬性的願付價格。
實證結果發現,「實施釣魚人數管制」、「延長禁漁期間」以及「設置海洋保育警察」皆是釣客偏好的管制方案,其願付價格分別為新台幣278.44元/年、145.88元/年以及464.5元/年,而「岸內垂釣點管制」則未達統計上的顯著。加入受訪者社經變數後發現,已退休的受訪者並不偏好實施減少垂釣點、而釣竿花費較高的受訪者對所有墾丁珊瑚礁永續生存管制措施屬性的願付價格皆較高,顯示具備不同社經特徵的受訪群體對不同的管制方案之願付價格與偏好有所差異。
推行海洋資源保育政策時,必須了解受影響者對政策的偏好,如此一來,才能避免不合適的政策產生,期望本研究結果能為墾丁國家公園管理處提供制定政策的參考,期許未來能夠制定出更具效率的永續珊瑚礁等海洋資源的管制方案。

Coral reefs are one of the most diverse biological resourcesof ecosystems. Beside playing a key role in the marine ecosystem balance, coral reefs are also important in social, economic and medicalsectors. More than 100 countries have coastlines with coral reefs. Taiwan has about 1/3 coral reefs species in the world due to its location and suitable climate. Kenting and offshore islands are the most abundant areas in Taiwan. A lot of angling activities in Kenting is due to its rich marine resources. But the negative impact of recreational fishing is often neglected. Relative regulatory programs are barely promoted. Considering the global trend of coral reefs degradation, it is important to make series of conservation policies. Therefore, the aim of this study is to investigate anglers'' preferences and willingness-to-pay (WTP) for conservation of coral reefs in Kenting National Park. Choice experiment method is used in this study. This research collected data about respondents'' preferences of conservation of coral reefs by face-to-face questionnaire. Multinomial logit model is employed to estimate the WTP for different conservation regulations of coral reefs such as capacity control of anglers, closed seasons, marine polices, and fishing spots.
The empirical results showed that respondents prefer conservation policies such as capacity control of anglers, expanding closed seasons, and setting up marine polices. However, the conservation policy for increase or decrease fishing spots was non-significant. The WTP for setting up marine polices received the highest value and anglers will overpay NT$464.5 per year. Moreover, respondents were willing to pay NT$278.44 per year and NT$145.88 per year for capacity control of anglers and expanding closed seasons respectively. Results from socio-economic characteristics indicated that retired respondents prefer a lower WTP premium for decreasing fishing spots, and anglers with higherinvestment for fishing rod were willing to pay more for all coral reefs conservation policies. The responses from anglers with different socio-economic characteristics revealeddifferences in preferences and WTP for conservation of coral reefs.
The results of this study demonstrate the preferences and WTP of respondents who once fished in Kenting for improvement to coral reefs status.These results could be a tool to assist public policy makers to improve conservation regulation of marine resources.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11455/97265
Rights: 不同意授權瀏覽/列印電子全文服務
Appears in Collections:應用經濟學系

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat Existing users please Login
nchu-106-7104034018-1.pdf978.28 kBAdobe PDFThis file is only available in the university internal network    Request a copy
Show full item record
 

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.