Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11455/97416
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChe-Wei Chuangen_US
dc.contributor.authorChun-Yi Wangen_US
dc.contributor.authorChen-Lin Changen_US
dc.contributor.author莊哲偉zh_TW
dc.contributor.author王鈞逸zh_TW
dc.contributor.author張甄玲zh_TW
dc.date2017-01zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2019-02-15T06:09:46Z-
dc.date.available2019-02-15T06:09:46Z-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11455/97416-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: This study investigates how the two different teaching approaches, traditional P.E. teaching and P.E. e-learning, affect written tests, learning achievement of backhand drive and forehand drive. Method: Studnets of two classes who took table tennis as their compulsory subject were randomly selected and they were randomly grouped into e-learning of P.E. (Class A) and P.E. traditional teaching (Class D). There were 60 students in each group. In the beginning of the semester, a pretest of backhand and forehand drives were conducted; in the end of the semester, a posttest of written test, backhand and forehand drives were performed. Results: First of all, in terms of backhand drive (t = 19.104,p<.05) and forehand drive (t = 20.537,p<.05), group of e-learning's posttest performance was significantly better than group of traditional teaching. Second, for e-learning group, posttest performance of backhand drive (t = -89.407,p<.05) was significantly better than pretest performance of backhand drive. The result was the same with forehand drive (t = -118.019,p<.05). On the other hand, for group of traditional teaching, the posttest result of backhand drive was similarly better than pretest result of backhand drive (t = -34.774,p<.05) and the same with the result of forehand drive test(t = -32.434,p<.05). Conclusion: 1. It helps improve learning achievement of table tennis' backhand and forehand drives to integrate e-learning teaching approach into P.E. course. 2. Integrating e-learning teaching into P.E. course significantly improves students' written test result.en_US
dc.description.abstract目的:本研究之目的為探討傳統體育教學與體育數位教學兩種不同教學模式,對桌 球運動紙筆測驗、反拍、正拍學習成效的影響。方法:隨機選取兩班興趣選項必修的桌 球課程班級,並將其隨機分派為數位教學組 (A 班) 及傳統教學組 (D 班),每班學生 60 人,於期初進行正拍及反拍技能前測,期末進行正拍、反拍後測及紙筆測驗。結果:一、 數位教學組不論是在反拍 (t = 19.104,p<.05) 或正拍 (t = 20.537,p<.05) 的後測成績 皆顯著優於傳統教學組,而數位教學組的筆試成績也顯著優於傳統教學組 (t = 17.433, p<.05)。二、在數位教學組,反拍測驗部分,後測成績顯著優於前測成績 (t = -89.407, p<.05),而在正拍測驗部分也有同樣的結果 (t = -118.019,p<.05);在傳統教學組,反拍 測驗後測成績同樣也是優於前測成績 (t = -34.774,p<.05),而在正拍部分也有相同結果 (t = -32.434,p<.05)。結論:一、兩種教學法皆可提升學生對於桌球運動的正、反拍技 能,而透過數位教學學習成效較佳。二、利用數位教學融入體育課程對於學生紙筆測驗 成績有顯著提升。zh_TW
dc.language.isozh_TWzh_TW
dc.relation興大體育學刊, Issue 16, Page(s) 37-47.zh_TW
dc.subjecttable tennisen_US
dc.subjectforehand driveen_US
dc.subjectbackhand driveen_US
dc.subject桌球zh_TW
dc.subject正拍zh_TW
dc.subject反拍zh_TW
dc.titleThe Effect of Different Teaching Modes on Table Tennis Learning Effectivenessen_US
dc.title不同教學模式對桌球學習成效的影響zh_TW
dc.typeJournal Articlezh_TW
item.languageiso639-1zh_TW-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.fulltextwith fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
Appears in Collections:興大體育學刊第16期
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
97410-4.pdf999.66 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record
 

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.